The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Demotic Texts
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The standard Mesopotamian court involved a college of three to five judges.
“This is peculiar, as the standard Mesopotamian court involved a college of three to five judges.”
From Vetting the Priest in Zechariah 3: The Satan between Divine and Achaemenid Administrations (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From Iranian to Greek via Aramaic: A Proposal for 'odrogos' (Metropolis, Ionia)
Obrador-cursach, B., & Corral Varela, D. (2025) · Gephyra · doi:10.37095/gephyra.1580661
Vetting the Priest in Zechariah 3: The Satan between Divine and Achaemenid Administrations
Silverman, J. M. (2014) · The Journal of Hebrew Scriptures · doi:10.5508/jhs.2014.v14.a6
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, C. J.
- Corresponding author
- Martin, Cary J.
- Venue
- The Elephantine Papyri in English
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Pages
- 277-385
- OpenAlex
- W4387551475
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- Demotic texts, Demotic script, ancient Egyptian language, Egyptian papyri
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
