Origins of Egyptian Kingship
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The simple attribution of royal status and pharaonic ideology to prehistoric parallels runs the risk of anachronism.
“while the simple attribution of royal status and pharaonic ideology to prehistoric parallels runs the risk of anachronism (but see Baines 1995a, pp. 95-99).”
From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as Baines 1995a
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation
Stevenson, A. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-016-9094-7 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
- Authors
- Baines, J.
- Corresponding author
- Baines, John
- ORCID
- Baines, John
- Venue
- Ancient Egyptian Kingship
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 1995-01-01
- Pages
- 95-156
- OpenAlex
- W4385473192
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Keywords
- Egyptian kingship, ancient Egypt, Pharaoh, dynastic Egypt, political history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
