Cited by 14Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyClassical Antiquity StudiesBiblical Studies and Interpretation

The Concept of Kingship During the Eighteenth Dynasty

Redford, Donald B.·1995·Ancient Egyptian Kingship

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/9789004676701_011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In their titularies, 18th Dynasty kings echoed their predecessors while introducing new elements, like belligerent epithets, that would be used for centuries.

    “In their titularies, 18th Dynasty kings echoed their predecessors while introducing new elements, like the belligerent epithets, that would be used for centuries (Redford 1995, 157-184; Leprohon 2013, 94).”

    From The Kingship and the Moon from the Late 17th to Early 18th Dynasties (2024) · cites this paper as Redford 1995, 157-184

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Redford, D. B.
Corresponding author
Redford, Donald B.
Venue
Ancient Egyptian Kingship
Publisher
BRILL
Published
1995-01-01
Pages
157-184
OpenAlex
W4385471005
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Keywords
kingship, Eighteenth Dynasty, ancient Egypt, Egyptian kingship, royal ideology, New Kingdom Egypt

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review