Cited by 0Architecture and Art History StudiesRenaissance Literature and CultureVisual Culture and Art Theory

Monstrous Inventions: Caricature and the Grotesque in Early Modern Art

Cheng, Sandra·2023·Grotesque and Caricature

Abstract

The introduction outlines the relationship between the grotesque and caricature. Initially inspired by the fashion for grotesque ornament, grotesque heads make frequent appearance in paintings, drawings, and prints over the course of the sixteenth century. Grotesque heads gave way to caricature, a graphic practice that flourished in the following century. As related forms of graphic representation that exaggerate physical features such as large noses, the practice of disfiguration raises questions about contemporary discourse on fantasy, invention and decorum in art.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/9789004679757_002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Authors
Cheng, S.
Corresponding author
Cheng, Sandra
Venue
Grotesque and Caricature
Publisher
BRILL
Published
2023-12-13
Pages
1-12
OpenAlex
W4390125525
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Architecture and Art History Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Renaissance Literature and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Visual Culture and Art Theory
Keywords
grotesque, caricature, disfigurement, early modern art, 16th-century painting, prints, fantasy, inventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review