Modelling energy metabolism in the pig - critical evaluation of a simple reference model
Abstract
Although the reference model described in Chapter 7 is ideal for demonstrating the principles of protein and energy interaction in the growing pig, several of the assumptions are too simplistic for incorporation into simulation models that are to be used primarily to assist the management of commercial piggeries. In particular, the simple function relating voluntary feed intake to liveweight is inadequate. The predicted performance of a growing pig is extremely sensitive to the accurate assessment of feed intake, which is known to be influenced by the genotype of the animal, nutrient deficiencies such as minerals and amino acids, gut fill, stocking density, the number of animals in a pen, cold and hot climates, activity and disease. The energy required for maintenance of zero energy balance cannot be described adequately by a simple function relating it to metabolic liveweight because it is known to vary from at least 300 to 500 MJ/W0.75 d in response to energy intake, composition of the body, relative size of the gastrointestinal tract and liver, and the activity of the pig. The assumption that there is a constant genotype dependent minimum ratio of fat to protein deposition for energy intakes below that required for maximum protein deposition, also can cause major inaccuracies in predictions because this ratio is affected by energy intake, compensatory gain and cold climatic environments. In addition, the efficiency of use of available energy from the different nutrient cla…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The metabolism model described by de Lange (1995) has many limitations, some of which were corrected and some not.
“This model has many limitations, pointed out by Black (1995), some of which were corrected, while some were not.”
From Modelling the effect of heat stress on food intake, heat production and growth in pigs (2004) · cites this paper as Black (1995)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modelling the effect of heat stress on food intake, heat production and growth in pigs
Fialho, F. B., van Milgen, J., Noblet, J., & Quiniou, N. (2004) · Animal Science · doi:10.1017/s1357729800054606 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Black, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Black, J.L.
- Venue
- Modelling growth in the pig
- Publisher
- Brill | Wageningen Academic
- Published
- 1995-01-01
- Pages
- 87-102
- OpenAlex
- W53655808
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wageningen Academic Publishers eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
- Keywords
- feed intake, maintenance energy, protein deposition, compensatory gain, cold climate, model assumptions, energy efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review