Modelling the effect of heat stress on food intake, heat production and growth in pigs
Abstract
Abstract A heat balance model was combined with a food intake model and a metabolism model, to form a larger model which estimates a pig’s response to heat stress. The combined model was implemented as a computer program, and used to calibrate, test and validate parts of the heat balance model. Heat transfer modes considered were convection, radiation and evaporation of water at the skin, and heating and humidification of air by breathing. Sensitivity analysis revealed a large effect of air temperature, humidity and velocity on heat loss, especially in a hot environment. It also showed that wetting of the pig’s skin is the most effective means to alleviate heat stress. The calibration procedure confirmed that characteristics related to heat tolerance in pigs must be re-evaluated, due mainly to the changes brought about by genetic improvement (such as reduced backfat thickness). The model was challenged using two different data sets. Although simulated results varied in the same way as measured data, more research is needed to determine more precisely some of the parameters. Long-term predictions were more reliable than those for short (1-day) periods.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
A heat balance model was integrated with food intake and metabolism models to predict pig responses to heat stress, implemented in STELLA and analysed in R. The combined model reproduced qualitative trends in food intake, heat production and growth, but required parameter recalibration for modern lean pigs and was less reliable for short-term temperature changes.
Key findings
- Sensitivity analysis showed large effects of air temperature, humidity and velocity on heat loss, especially in hot conditions: a 0·1°C temperature increase decreased heat loss by 0·52% in the hot environment, while a +0·01 change in the hot wallowing parameter \(r_{ww}\) increased heat loss by 1·25%.
- Wetting of the pig’s skin was the most effective means to alleviate heat stress; parameters related to skin wetting had the most significant effect on heat loss, especially in the hot environment.
- Calibration against Quiniou et al. (2001) required multiplying thermoneutral food intake by 0·966, increasing skin thermal conductance from 50 to 80 W·kg\(^{1/3}\)/m\(^2\) per °C in the cold and from 200 to 320 in the heat, and increasing maximum breathing rate from 0·583 to 1·458 l/s per m\(^2\).
- Validation against Collin et al. (2001) gave mean square prediction errors of 0·0164 for daily food intake and 8·65 for body weight, corresponding to deviations of 0·128 kg/day and 2·94 kg; bias accounted for 0·371 of food intake error and 0·515 of body weight error.
Methods
- The heat balance model of Fialho et al. (2004) was combined with the NRC (1998) food intake model and de Lange’s (1995) metabolism model; body temperature linked the models, with environmental conditions as inputs to the heat balance model.
- Sensitivity analysis varied environmental factors and model parameters under cold (5°C, 0·80 relative humidity) and hot (35°C, 0·40 relative humidity) conditions for a 40-kg pig with 6·2 kg protein and 6·5 kg lipid mass; default heat loss was 16,521 kJ/day cold and 9,314 kJ/day hot.
- Calibration used six ad libitum groups from Quiniou et al. (2001) with 30- to 90-kg pigs at 12–29°C; validation challenged the model with Collin et al. (2001) (105 piglets, initial average 15·5 kg, 17 days, 19–35°C) and Giles (1992) (11 pigs, 24-h measurements), using MSPE and Theil decomposition.
Limitations
- Stated: the food intake model does not consider gut fill and is not valid for very cold environments where animals cannot eat enough to compensate for heat loss.
- Stated: more research is needed to determine parameters precisely, especially breathing rate, efficiency of heat loss by breathing, and thermal insulation of the skin in modern pigs; short-term effects of sudden temperature changes are not well predicted, and long-term predictions were more reliable than 1-day predictions.
- Stated/evident: calibration changes were made arbitrarily in some cases (e.g. thermal conductance and maximum breathing rate), and the paper notes these “may or may not be correct”; no data were found on actual thermal conductance in modern lean pigs, and sensitivity results are valid only for the parameter values used.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
3 of 24 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation§ Model description · p. 2
Heat loss is not very sensitive to the critical body temperatures Tcb and Teb.
“The best values for these critical body temperatures may be different, but, as demonstrated by Fialho et al . (2004), heat loss is not very sensitive to these parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Fialho et al., 2004 source
- Premisecitation§ Model description · p. 2
Heat loss is affected little by the parameter Thb.
“Although the true value of Thb may be different, heat loss is affected little by this parameter (Fialho et al ., 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Fialho et al., 2004 source
- Findingown data§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7
The effect of humidity on heat loss becomes increasingly important at higher temperatures, as shown by the larger slope at 35°C.
“The effect of humidity on heat loss becomes increasingly important under higher temperatures, as may be seen by the larger slope at 35ºC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7
At 15°C, relative humidity had no effect on heat loss.
“At 15ºC, relative humidity had no effect on heat loss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ Calibration of the model · p. 9
Despite correction for food intake in the thermoneutral zone, predicted food intake at high temperatures was lower than observed.
“Despite the correction for food intake in the thermoneutral zone, predicted food intake at high temperatures was lower than observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingnone given§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 5
The thermal conductance of the skin (ct) is an important parameter for heat loss, especially in the cold.
“The thermal conductance of the skin ( c t ) is also an important parameter, especially in the cold.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 6
The lower (Tcb) and upper (Thb) critical body temperatures had an effect on heat loss estimates.
“The lower ( Tcb ) and upper ( Thb ) critical body temperatures had an effect on the heat loss estimates, and these values should be estimated with a reasonable amount of precision.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 5
The parameters related to wetting of the skin (rww and rwp) had the most significant effect on heat loss, especially in the hot environment.
“The parameters of the model related to wetting of the skin ( rww and r wp ) had the most significant effect on heat loss, especially in the hot environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 1
Simulated results varied in the same way as measured data.
“Although simulated results varied in the same way as measured data, more research is needed to determine more precisely some of the parameters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 6
Heat loss is moderately sensitive to the emissivity of the skin (el) and radiating surfaces (er).
“Heat loss is moderately sensitive to the emissivity of the skin ( e l ) and radiating surfaces ( e r ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7
Changing cpb from 4 to 40 kJ/kg per °C had no noticeable effect on heat loss.
“The value of c pb was changed from 4 to 40 kJ/kg per ºC without any noticeable effect on heat loss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 5
In the hot environment, a 0.1°C increase in ambient temperature decreased heat loss by 0.52%.
“Ambient temperature and humidity had a greater effect in the hot environment, where a 0·1ºC increase in temperature decreased heat loss by 0·52%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7
At 5°C, humidity had a slight effect on heat loss.
“At 5ºC, there was a slight effect of humidity, due to the minimum amount of evaporation that still occurs in cold conditions, which is greater when air humidity is low.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 5
Small changes in kA result in proportionally large changes in heat loss in both cold and hot environments.
“Small changes in kA (the coefficient relating skin surface area to body weight) result in proportionally large changes in heat loss, both in cold and hot environments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7
Changing cpb to 400 kJ/kg per °C did not change steady-state heat loss.
“It was then changed to 400 kJ/kg per ºC, and the steady-state heat loss remained the same.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 6
Parameters related to heat loss by breathing (rvr and kx) have a more significant effect under hot conditions than in the cold.
“The parameters related to heat loss by breathing ( r vr and k x ) have a more significant effect under hot conditions than in the cold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 5
A 1% increase in ct raises heat loss by 0.20%.
“Although a 1% increase will only raise heat loss by 0·20%, the significant advances in reducing backfat thickness suggest that this parameter may have”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 5
A small increase in rww results in a relatively large (1.25%) increase in heat loss.
“Not only does a small increase in the value of rww (the fraction of skin wetted by wallowing) result in a relatively large (1·25%) increase in heat loss, but also this parameter may vary significantly if the pigs have access to water.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 6
The parameters hL, pa, pwse' and cpb do not significantly affect heat loss.
“The other parameters analysed ( hL , pa , pwse ' and c pb ) do not affect heat loss significantly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Calibration of the model · p. 9
Within the thermoneutral zone, food intake as predicted by the NRC (1998) was slightly overestimated.
“Within the thermoneutral zone, food intake as predicted by the NRC (1998) was slightly overestimated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NRC, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 1
Sensitivity analysis revealed a large effect of air temperature, humidity and velocity on heat loss, especially in a hot environment.
“Sensitivity analysis revealed a large effect of air temperature, humidity and velocity on heat loss, especially in a hot environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 5
Air speed was about equally important in both cold and hot environments.
“Air speed was about equally important in both environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 5
The model was very sensitive to ambient temperature, relative humidity and air speed.
“The model was very sensitive to the three environmental variables ( Ta , φ a and Va ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Abstract · p. 1
Long-term predictions were more reliable than those for short (1-day) periods.
“Long-term predictions were more reliable than those for short (1-day) periods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7
Increasing cpb to 400 kJ/kg per °C increased the time to reach steady state from less than one day to around 6 days.
“However, the time needed to reach steady state increased from less than one day to around 6 days.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Calibration of the model · p. 9
At higher temperatures, simulated food intake and heat production decreased at a higher rate than was observed.
“At higher temperatures, simulated food intake and heat production decreased at a higher rate than was observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Calibration of the model · p. 9
Predicted heat production underestimated observed heat production both at lower and higher temperatures.
“In addition, predicted heat production underestimated the observed heat production both at lower and higher temperatures (Figure 5b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Calibration of the model · p. 9
The experimental pigs appeared to be less affected by heat stress than was expected by the model.
“The experimental pigs still appeared to be less affected by heat stress than was expected by the model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Challenging the model · p. 12
The observed reduction in food intake at higher temperatures was greater than simulated by the model in the Giles (1992) experiments.
“The observed reduction in food intake at higher temperatures was greater than simulated by the model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giles (1992)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data§ Calibration of the model · p. 9
Simulated food intake and heat production responses after changing maximum ventilation rate seem to follow closely the mean observed values at all temperatures considered.
“Simulated food intake and heat production responses seem to follow closely the mean observed values at all temperatures considered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Calibration of the model · p. 9
Under hot conditions, the model still underestimated food intake and heat production.
“Under hot conditions, however, the model still underestimated food intake and heat production.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Calibration of the model · p. 9
A reduction in tolerance to cold was observed in the data compared with simulated results using parameters from the literature.
“In any case, a reduction in tolerance to cold was observed in the data, compared with the simulated results using parameters from the literature”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Calibration of the model · p. 9
The discrepancy may be due to using coefficients in the heat balance simulation that result from somewhat older literature (Bruce and Clark, 1979).
“This may be due to using coefficients in the heat balance simulation that result from somewhat older literature (Bruce and Clark, 1979).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bruce and Clark, 1979 source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7
The small effect in the cold environment occurred because the simulated cold environment was close to the limit of the thermoneutral zone.
“This happened because the simulated cold environment was close to the limit of the thermoneutral zone, thus still subject to a small effect of the changes which occur within that zone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 5
The effect of air speed on heat loss in a hot environment would be greater if the animal's skin were wetter.
“Although the increase in heat loss at higher air speeds was larger in the cold, the effect in a hot environment would be greater if the animal's skin was wetter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Calibration of the model · p. 9
The pigs used in the experiment were more adapted to higher temperatures than assumed in the simulation.
“Both these observations suggest that the pigs used in the experiment were more adapted to higher temperatures than assumed in the simulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7
The sensitivity analysis is valid for the parameter values used.
“The sensitivity analysis is valid for the parameter values used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 6
el and er should not differ much from their default values.
“These parameters influence heat exchange by radiation and should not differ much from their default values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Calibration of the model · p. 9
The expected value of thermal conductance of the skin of modern pigs could be greater than the value originally used in the model.
“Therefore the expected value of thermal conductance of the skin of modern pigs could be greater.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Advances in pig breeding have led to leaner animals, which have less fat acting as a thermal insulator under the skin surface.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7
If simulated conditions or parameter values change substantially, the model may become more or less sensitive to the parameters.
“If the simulated conditions or parameter values change substantially, the model may become more or less sensitive to the parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Abstract · p. 1
Wetting of the pig's skin is the most effective means to alleviate heat stress.
“It also showed that wetting of the pig's skin is the most effective means to alleviate heat stress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Introduction · p. 1
The effect of the environment on a pig depends on ambient temperature, humidity and other environmental factors, as well as the pig's size, growth rate, behaviour and carcass characteristics.
“The extent to which the environment affects a pig depends not only on ambient temperature, humidity and other environmental factors, but also on the size, rate of growth, behaviour and carcass characteristics of the pig itself (Bruce and Clark, 1979).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bruce and Clark, 1979 source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7
The effect of cpb on stability is especially important for growth models using larger integration time steps.
“This is especially important for growth models using larger integration time steps (e.g. 1 day).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Introduction · p. 1
Heat stress reduces food intake in pigs.
“Heat stress is known to reduce food intake in pigs (Close and Mount, 1978).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Close and Mount, 1978 source
- Premisecitation§ Metabolism · p. 4
The maintenance energy requirement of growing pigs is better expressed as a function of body weight raised to the power 0.60 rather than 0.75.
“The maintenance energy requirement ( Em ) of growing pigs is better expressed as a function of body weight raised to the power 0·60, rather than 0·75 as assumed in the original growth model (Noblet et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Noblet et al., 1999 source
- Premisecitation§ Food intake · p. 3
Giles (1992) demonstrated a direct relationship between high body temperatures and reduced food intake.
“Giles (1992) demonstrated the direct relationship between high body temperatures and reduced food intake.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giles (1992)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data§ Abstract · p. 1
Characteristics related to heat tolerance in pigs must be re-evaluated, due mainly to changes brought about by genetic improvement such as reduced backfat thickness.
“The calibration procedure confirmed that characteristics related to heat tolerance in pigs must be re-evaluated, due mainly to the changes brought about by genetic improvement (such as reduced backfat thickness).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Modern pig genotypes are leaner and grow faster, producing more heat at the same body weight compared with genotypes of the past.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7
The effect of changing the cold value of rwp and rvr in the hot environment was expected because the simulated hot environment was within the evaporative zone.
“This result was expected as the simulated hot environment was within the evaporative zone, thus being influenced by both the minimum and maximum value of the parameters which change within that zone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7
The slight effect of humidity at 5°C was due to the minimum amount of evaporation that still occurs in cold conditions, which is greater when air humidity is low.
“At 5ºC, there was a slight effect of humidity, due to the minimum amount of evaporation that still occurs in cold conditions, which is greater when air humidity is low.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Calibration of the model · p. 9
Thermal conductance of the skin originally used in the model for a cold environment was 50 W·kg 1/3 /m2 per oC, derived from Bruce and Clark (1979).
“Thermal conductance of the skin originally used in the model for a cold environment was 50 W·kg 1/3 /m 2 per ºC, which was derived from Bruce and Clark (1979).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bruce and Clark (1979) source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 6
There is more uncertainty about the values of rvr and kx than about other parameters of the model.
“Although the sensitivity was not as high, there is more uncertainty as to the values of these parameters, when compared with other parameters of the model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 6
Modern pig genotypes must be able to lose more heat to survive in the same environment.
“They must, therefore, be able to lose more heat in order to survive in the same environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Modern pig genotypes are leaner and grow faster, producing more heat at the same body weight compared with genotypes of the past.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions · p. 12
The changes in the parameters required to fit simulated with experimental data are an indication that modern lean pigs are behaving differently to the thermal environment than their fatter counterparts used to.
“The changes in the parameters required to fit simulated with experimental data are an indication that modern lean pigs are behaving differently to the thermal environment than their fatter counterparts used to.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Advances in pig breeding have led to leaner animals, which have less fat acting as a thermal insulator under the skin surface.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Challenging the model · p. 12
The short-term effects of sudden changes in temperature are not well predicted by the model.
“This serves to illustrate that the short-term effects of sudden changes in temperature are not well predicted by the model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Challenging the model · p. 12
The animals may not have had time to adapt to the temperature change.
“and the animals may not have had time to adapt to the temperature change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Challenging the model · p. 12
All animals used in the Giles (1992) experiments were submitted to a surgical procedure prior to the experiment.
“all animals used in the experiments were submitted to a surgical procedure prior to the experiment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giles (1992)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions · p. 12
Mean body temperature may be used to simulate the animal's response to heat and cold stress.
“Its value may be used to simulate the animal's response to heat and cold stress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions · p. 12
Mean body temperature is an adequate intermediate variable to be used when modelling a pig's response to the thermal environment.
“Mean body temperature is an adequate intermediate variable to be used when modelling a pig's response to the thermal environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Conclusions · p. 12
Except for temporary responses to a sudden change in the environment, the heat balance model is capable of predicting heat loss and changes in food intake with reasonable accuracy.
“Except for temporary responses to a sudden change in the environment, it is capable of predicting heat loss and changes in food intake with reasonable accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Challenging the model · p. 12
Food intake was only measured for 1 or 2 days immediately following the increase in temperature in the Giles (1992) experiments.
“Food intake was only measured for 1 or 2 days immediately following the increase in temperature”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giles (1992)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Challenging the model · p. 12
One animal stopped eating on the day the temperature was raised from 22.6 to 33.8oC.
“One animal stopped eating on the day the temperature was raised from 22·6 to 33·8ºC”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giles (1992)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
- May combine two claims. 32
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Introduction · p. 2Heat balance models predict the effect of the thermal environment on variables such as body temperature.
“Heat balance models, such as the one described by Fialho et al. (2004) and Turnpenny et al. (2000a and b), predict the effect of the thermal environment on some variables, like body temperature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Fialho et al. (2004) source
- cites Turnpenny et al. (2000a and b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 6Changes in Tcb affect heat loss under cold stress, while Thb affects the animal's response in the heat.
“The effect of changes in Tcb is evident under cold stress, while Thb changes the animal's response in the heat.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Calibration of the model · p. 9At lower temperatures, observed heat production increased, while simulated values stayed approximately constant.
“At lower temperatures, observed heat production increased, while simulated values stayed approximately constant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7Changing the hot value of rwp and rvr had no influence on heat loss in the cold environment, but changing their cold value affected the response in the hot environment.
“Changing their 'hot' value had no influence on heat loss in the cold environment, but changing their 'cold' value affected the response in the hot environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 6Teb slightly affects heat loss in hot environments.
“The evaporative critical body temperature ( Teb ) affects heat loss in hot environments slightly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 5Under default conditions, predicted heat loss was 16,521 kJ/day in the cold environment and 9,314 kJ/day in the hot environment.
“Under the default conditions, heat loss was 16 521 and 9 314 kJ/ day, for the cold and hot conditions, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 5In the cold environment, air temperature was important, but humidity had a very small effect on heat loss, due to decreased importance of evaporative losses.
“In the cold environment, air temperature was also important, but humidity had a very small effect, due to the decreased importance of evaporative losses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7Changing the cold value of rww, ka and ct had no influence on heat loss in the hot environment, but changing their hot value had a small effect in the cold environment.
“Changing the 'cold' value of these parameters had no influence on heat loss in the hot environment, but changing their 'hot' value had a small effect in the cold environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 5ka has an equally important effect on heat loss as kA but in the opposite direction.
“Similarly, k a (the fraction of the animal's skin in contact with itself or with other animals) has an equally important effect but in the opposite direction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Challenging the model · p. 11The mean square prediction errors were 0.0164 for daily food intake and 8.65 for body weight, corresponding to deviations of 0.128 kg/day and 2.94 kg, respectively.
“The mean square prediction errors (MSPE) were 0·0164 and 8·65 for daily food intake and body weight, respectively, which correspond to a deviation of 0·128 kg/day and 2·94 kg, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Challenging the model · p. 12Although predicted food intake behaved similarly to observed, the observed decrease in food intake at higher temperature was much more severe than predicted.
“Although the predicted food intake behaved in a manner similar to the observed, the observed decrease in food intake at higher temperature was much more severe than was predicted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ Challenging the model · p. 12The single measurement with air temperature lower than thermoneutral (19.6oC) was also lower than the corresponding thermoneutral value.
“Curiously, the single measurement with air temperature lower than thermoneutral (19·6ºC) was also lower than the corresponding thermoneutral value.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Calibration of the model · p. 9Both food intake and heat production increased in colder temperatures after the thermal conductance change, similar to experimental observations.
“Both food intake and heat production increased in colder temperatures, in a manner similar to changes in the experimental observations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Challenging the model · p. 10Both food intake and body weight were underestimated by the model at higher temperatures in the Collin et al. (2001) simulation.
“Although the behaviour of simulated data was compatible with the observations, both food intake and body weight were underestimated by the model at higher temperatures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Collin et al. (2001) source
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Calibration of the model · p. 9The general shape of the food intake and heat production curves seems to be correct, with an approximately constant value around the thermoneutral zone and increased and decreased values below and above it, respectively.
“Most important, the general shape of the food intake and heat production curves seems to be correct, with an approximately constant value around the thermoneutral zone and increased and decreased values below and above it, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Challenging the model · p. 11The decomposition of MSPE showed proportions due to bias, regression error and disturbances of 0.371, 0.343 and 0.286 for daily food intake and 0.515, 0.376 and 0.109 for body weight.
“These were, respectively, 0·371, 0·343 and 0·286 for daily food intake and 0·515, 0·376 and 0·109 for body weight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 6Higher critical body temperatures cause the animal to respond faster to cold stress and slower to heat stress, reducing heat loss in both cases.
“Higher critical body temperatures mean that the animal will respond faster to cold stress and slower to heat stress, and in both cases heat loss is reduced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Calibration of the model · p. 7Food intake varied with body weight according to the function described before (NRC, 1998).
“Food intake varied with body weight according to the function described before (NRC, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NRC, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7Using a larger value for cpb artificially increases the heat buffering capacity of the animal, allowing a stable solution with a larger time step.
“When a larger value for c pb is used, the heat buffering capacity of the animal is artificially increased, and a stable (non-chaotic) solution may be reached with a larger time step.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 6rvr and kx may have significantly different values, which would substantially affect heat loss.
“They may, therefore, have significantly different values, which would result in a substantial effect on heat loss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Metabolism · p. 5Metabolizable energy intake may be calculated using relationships described by Noblet (1996), who considered energy loss as methane to be 0.004 of digestible energy and energy loss in urine as 3 kJ/g of catabolized protein.
“Metabolizable energy intake may be calculated using the relationships described by Noblet (1996), who considered energy loss as methane to be 0·004 of digestible energy, and energy loss in the urine as 3 kJ/g of catabolized protein.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Noblet (1996)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 5A larger value of ka reduces the area of skin available for heat exchange and therefore reduces heat loss.
“A larger value of k a effectively reduces the area of skin available for heat exchange, and therefore reduces heat loss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Food intake · p. 3Body temperature was used to represent the combined effect of all environmental factors because it is directly affected by the thermal balance.
“Body temperature (estimated by the heat balance model) was used to represent the combined effect of all environmental factors (temperature, humidity, air speed, etc. ), because it is directly affected by the thermal balance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ Food intake · p. 3The NRC model has limited accuracy, so thermoneutral food intake was corrected using experimental data to reduce errors.
“Because the NRC model has limited accuracy, thermoneutral food intake was corrected using experimental data, as described with the calibration of the model, such that the errors in accuracy were reduced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7The model's sensitivity may change because the response may not be linear and the reference heat loss value may differ.
“This occurs because the response may not be linear and the reference value of heat loss may be different.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 7At 15°C, relative humidity had no effect because conditions were within the thermoneutral zone and animals could completely compensate for humidity changes.
“This happened because the conditions were within the thermoneutral zone, and the animals were able to completely compensate for changes resulting from varying humidity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Introduction · p. 1In a cold environment, although food intake may increase, approximately all the additional energy is used to generate heat, and growth is not improved.
“Although food intake may increase, approximately all the additional energy is used to generate heat, and growth is not improved (Black et al., 1986).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Black et al., 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Sensitivity analysis · p. 5Advances in reducing backfat thickness suggest that ct may have changed in past years.
“Although a 1% increase will only raise heat loss by 0·20%, the significant advances in reducing backfat thickness suggest that this parameter may have”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Modern pig genotypes are leaner and grow faster, producing more heat at the same body weight compared with genotypes of the past.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ Metabolism · p. 4One of the most significant deficiencies of the metabolism model is food intake prediction, which was corrected for thermoneutral values.
“One of its most significant deficiencies is food intake prediction, which was corrected for thermoneutral values, so that the focus remained on the deviations from thermoneutrality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Metabolism · p. 4The metabolism model described by de Lange (1995) has many limitations, some of which were corrected and some not.
“This model has many limitations, pointed out by Black (1995), some of which were corrected, while some were not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Black (1995) source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoning§ Food intake · p. 4The food intake model does not consider the limiting effect of gut fill and is not valid for very cold environments where the animal cannot eat enough to compensate for heat loss.
“This model currently does not consider the limiting effect of gut fill on food intake. Therefore, it is not valid for very cold environments, when the animal would not be able to eat enough food to compensate for heat loss.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Model description · p. 3The consequence of including the simplifying assumptions (no sunlight, no conduction to floor, wall temperature equal to air, negligible heating of ingested food and water) is the same as having a slightly different air speed, temperature or humidity, shifting the thermal comfort zone on an ambient temperature scale.
“The consequence of including these assumptions is the same as that of having a slightly different air speed, temperature or humidity, in the sense that they would shift the thermal comfort zone on an ambient temperature scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Animals were not exposed to sunlight.
- The authors state this as an assumption: There was no heat exchange by conduction to the floor.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Temperature of walls was the same as air.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Heating of ingested food and water was negligible.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Calibration of the model · p. 9The reduction in tolerance to cold could have been caused by reduced tissue insulation.
“which could have been caused by reduced tissue insulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Advances in pig breeding have led to leaner animals, which have less fat acting as a thermal insulator under the skin surface.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Calibration of the model · p. 9Changing many parameters by a small amount or one parameter by a large amount would yield similar results (an increase in heat loss under heat stress).
“For the purpose of testing the model, changing many parameters by a small amount or one parameter by a large amount would yield similar results (i.e. , an increase in heat loss under heat stress).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Challenging the model · p. 12This cessation of eating is unlikely to be maintained if the experiment was conducted for a longer period of time.
“which is unlikely to be maintained if the experiment was conducted for a longer period of time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ Conclusions · p. 12The evaluated heat balance model may be used to predict heat loss from a pig to its environment and changes in a conceptual body temperature.
“The evaluated heat balance model may be used to predict heat loss from a pig to its environment and changes in a conceptual body temperature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Challenging the model · p. 10Using the equations described by Noblet (1996), digestible energy of the Collin et al. diet was calculated to be 14.91 MJ/kg.
“Using the equations described by Noblet (1996), digestible energy was calculated to be 14·91 MJ/kg.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Noblet (1996)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ Calibration of the model · p. 9It is likely that a combination of factors is responsible for the adaptation of the experimental animals to hot conditions.
“It is likely that a combination of factors is responsible for this adaptation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Challenging the model · p. 11The bias (underestimation of observed values) is responsible for a large proportion of the error in food intake prediction, and for most of the error in body weight prediction.
“This indicates that the bias (the underestimation of the observed values) is responsible for a large proportion of the error in food intake prediction, and for most of the error in body weight prediction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Challenging the model · p. 10The experiment of Collin et al. (2001) involved 105 piglets with an initial average body weight of 15.5 kg, raised for 17 days under temperatures between 19 and 35°C with intervals of 2°C.
“In this experiment, a total of 105 piglets with an initial average body weight of 15·5 kg were raised for 17 days under one of a series of experimental temperatures ranging between 19 and 35ºC with intervals of 2ºC”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Collin et al. (2001) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Conclusions · p. 12Mean body temperature synthesizes the effect of all environmental factors that affect an animal's thermal comfort in a single value.
“It synthesizes the effect of all environmental factors that affect an animal's thermal comfort in a single value.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Challenging the model · p. 11In the Giles (1992) experiments, a total of 11 pigs were exposed to different thermal environments for 24 h, and voluntary food intake was measured.
“In these experiments, a total of 11 pigs were exposed to different thermal environments for a period of 24 h, and voluntary food intake was measured.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giles (1992)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Calibration of the model · p. 9The experimental animals were able to dissipate more heat than was predicted by the model, and could therefore maintain a greater heat production and higher food intake level.
“In order to maintain the same body temperature under these environmental conditions, the experimental animals were able to dissipate more heat than was predicted by the model. They could therefore maintain a greater heat production, and consequently a higher food intake level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Challenging the model · p. 12The surgical procedure may have made the animals more susceptible to stress.
“which may have made the animals more susceptible to stress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Challenging the model · p. 12The pigs used in the Giles (1992) experiment may have been more sensitive to heat stress than the ones used to calibrate the model.
“It may be that the pigs used in this experiment were more sensitive to heat stress than the ones used to calibrate the model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giles (1992)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Challenging the model · p. 10The underestimation may indicate that the parameters of the model may need to be better estimated, or that the animals used in the experiment were genetically more resistant to heat than the animals used to calibrate the model.
“This may indicate that the parameters of the model may need to be better estimated, or that the animals used in the experiment were genetically more resistant to heat than the animals used to calibrate the model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Homeothermic animals maintain body temperature within a narrow range despite large fluctuations in ambient conditions.
“Homeothermic animals are able to maintain body temperature within a narrow range of values, despite large fluctuations in ambient conditions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Homeothermic animals maintain a balance between heat production and heat loss to the environment.
“They do this by maintaining a balance between heat production and heat loss to the environment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In a comfortable thermal situation, heat production is more or less independent of ambient temperature, and environmental variations are compensated by physiological regulation mechanisms maintaining heat loss at an approximately constant level.
“In a comfortable thermal situation, heat production is more or less independent of ambient temperature, and environmental variations are compensated by physiological regulation mechanisms which maintain heat loss at an approximately constant level.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In a cold environment, heat production increases to compensate for greater heat loss.
“In a cold environment, heat production increases in order to compensate for a greater heat loss.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In a hot environment, pigs attempt to maximize heat loss by breathing faster and minimize heat production by reducing food intake.
“In a hot environment, pigs attempt to maximize heat loss (by breathing faster) and to minimize heat production (by reducing food intake).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Variations in the thermal environment cause minor changes in mean body temperature, to which the animal's thermal regulation mechanism responds.
“The model uses the concept that variations in the thermal environment cause minor changes in mean body temperature ( Tb , ºC), to which the animal's thermal regulation mechanism responds.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The animal's thermal regulation responses attempt to maintain body temperature as close as possible to normal physiological levels.
“These responses attempt to maintain body temperature as close as possible to normal physiological levels.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ambient temperature alone is not sufficient to characterize the animal's sensation of heat or cold; it also depends on humidity, wind, radiation, body size and other factors.
“Ambient temperature alone is not sufficient to characterize the animal's sensation of heat or cold, which also depends on humidity, wind, radiation, body size and other factors.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Within the thermoneutral zone, mean body temperature stays between the lower critical body temperature (Tcb) and the evaporative critical body temperature (Teb).
“Within the thermoneutral zone, mean body temperature is considered to stay between the lower critical body temperature ( Tcb ) and the evaporative critical body temperature ( Teb ).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Within the evaporative zone, mean body temperature is maintained between Teb and the upper critical body temperature (Thb), and feedback mechanisms based on increased evaporative loss and reduced food intake are activated.
“Within this range, mean body temperature is considered to be maintained between Teb and the upper critical body temperature ( Thb ), and feedback mechanisms based on increased evaporative loss and reduced food intake are activated.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Animals were not exposed to sunlight.
“animals were not exposed to sunlight”
The authors state this as an assumption.
There was no heat exchange by conduction to the floor.
“there was no heat exchange by conduction to the floor”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Temperature of walls was the same as air.
“temperature of walls was the same as air”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Heating of ingested food and water was negligible.
“heating of ingested food and water was negligible”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The NRC food intake model referred to pigs in a thermoneutral environment.
“Although not stated by NRC (1998), it was assumed that this model referred to pigs in a thermoneutral environment.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Voluntary food intake is reduced under heat stress and increased in cold conditions, varying with body temperature.
“Voluntary food intake was considered to be reduced under heat stress and increased in cold conditions, varying with body temperature as shown in Figure 3.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Conceptually, food intake increases linearly as body temperature drops below Tcb; in the thermoneutral zone, food intake is constant; between Teb and Thb, food intake decreases linearly and becomes zero above Thb.
“Conceptually, food intake increases linearly as body temperature drops below Tcb . In the thermoneutral zone, body temperature remains between Tcb and Teb and food intake is constant. Between Teb and Thb , food intake decreases linearly and becomes zero at body temperatures above Thb .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The maintenance energy requirement (Em) is 1000 kJ/day per kg^0.6.
“Therefore, Em was assumed to be 1000 kJ/day per kg 0·6”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The energy costs of protein and lipid deposition are 37.0 and 47.7 kJ/g, respectively.
“the energy cost of protein ( Epd ) and lipid ( Eld ) deposition were assumed to be 37·0 and 47·7 kJ/g, respectively (Noblet et al., 1999).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
An additional energy requirement is added to maintenance under cold stress so that all extra food consumed is used to generate heat.
“An additional energy requirement was added to maintenance when the animal was under cold stress, so that all the extra food consumed under these conditions would be used to generate heat.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The conversion of extra energy into heat occurs mainly by shivering.
“The conversion of extra energy into heat occurs mainly by shivering.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Modern pig genotypes are leaner and grow faster, producing more heat at the same body weight compared with genotypes of the past.
“Modern pig genotypes are leaner and grow faster, producing more heat at the same body weight, when compared with genotypes of the past.”
The paper relies on this without support.
rww may vary significantly if pigs have access to water.
“this parameter may vary significantly if the pigs have access to water.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Advances in pig breeding have led to leaner animals, which have less fat acting as a thermal insulator under the skin surface.
“Advances in pig breeding have led to leaner animals, which have less fat acting as a thermal insulator under the skin surface.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Initial protein (P0) and lipid (L0) mass of the animals in the Collin et al. (2001) experiment were equal.
“Assuming initial protein ( P0 ) and lipid ( L0 ) mass were equal”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Temperature of the surrounding radiating surfaces is the same as air temperature.
“Temperature of the surrounding radiating surfaces ( ° C) is assumed to be the same as air temperature:”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Exhaled air is saturated with water vapour.
“Enthalpy of exhaled air (kJ/kg) assumes it is saturated with water vapour:”
The authors state this as an assumption.
There is no sunlight and no contact with the floor, so the fraction of body surface exposed to a shaded environment is all the skin not in contact with other animals.
“Fraction of body surface exposed to a shaded environment, assuming no sunlight and no contact with the floor, is all the skin which is not in contact with other animals:”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most parameters related to the thermal environment were determined a few decades ago.
“Most of the parameters related to the thermal environment were determined a few decades ago”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Changes in body temperature are a function of heat production and heat loss.
“The fundamental concept in the model is that changes in body temperature are a function of heat production and heat loss:”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Acceptance date precedes receipt date
MinorThe paper states that it was accepted on 27 February 2003, before it was received on 10 July 2003.
“Received 10 July 2003”
“Accepted 27 February 2003”
Cites
Nutrient Requirements of Swine
National Research Council (1998) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/6016 · Cited by 2,319 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition – 1979
(1980) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-04245-4 · Cited by 1,618 · see citing works
Prediction and Improved Estimation in Linear Models
Ray, W. D., Bibby, J., & Toutenburg, H. (1979) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/3009678 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Prediction and Improved Estimation in Linear Models.
Sinclair, C. D., Bibby, J., & Toutenburg, H. (1978) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530624 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Noblet, J., Karege, C., Dubois, S., & van Milgen, J. (1999) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1999.7751208x · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Self-citationModels of heat production and critical temperature for growing pigs
Bruce, J. M., & Clark, J. J. (1979) · Animal Science · doi:10.1017/s0003356100023266 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
(1986) · Cited by 149 · see citing works
The modelling of growth in the pig.
Moughan, P. J., & Verstegen, M. W. A. (1988) · Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.18174/njas.v36i2.16687 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Quiniou, N., Noblet, J., van Milgen, J. J., & Dubois, S. (2001) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn2000217 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citationClose, W. H. (1978) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19780144 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Turnpenny, J. R., McArthur, A. J., Clark, J. A., et al. (2000) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1923(99)00159-8 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Close, W. H., & Mount, L. E. (1978) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19780142 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Turnpenny, J. R., Wathes, C. M., Clark, J. A., et al. (2000) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1923(99)00157-4 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Prediction of tissular body composition from protein and lipid deposition in growing pigs1
Quinious, N., & Noblet, J. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.7361567x · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationModelling the effect of high, constant temperature on food intake in young growing pigs
Collin, A., Milgent, J. V., & Dividich, J. L. (2001) · Animal Science · doi:10.1017/s1357729800052048 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationde Lange, C. F. M. (1995) · Wageningen Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004684287_009 · Cited by 45
Modelling energy metabolism in the pig - critical evaluation of a simple reference model
Black, J. L. (1995) · Modelling growth in the pig · doi:10.1163/9789004684287_010 · Cited by 38
Theoretical model of heat balance in pigs
Fialho, F. B., Bucklin, R. A., Zazueta, F. S., & Myer, R. O. (2004) · Animal Science · doi:10.1017/s135772980005459x · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationImproved Estimation and Prediction
Bibby, J., & Toutenburg, H. (1978) · Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik Band 58, Heft 1 · doi:10.1515/9783112549407-007
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Giles L. R. 1992. Energy expenditure of growing pigs at high ambient temperatures. Ph. D. thesis, University of Sydney.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review: Future consequences of climate change for European Union pig production
Renaudeau, D., & Dourmad, J.-Y. (2021) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2021.100372 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Theoretical model of heat balance in pigs
Fialho, F. B., Bucklin, R. A., Zazueta, F. S., & Myer, R. O. (2004) · Animal Science · doi:10.1017/s135772980005459x · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, Z., Zhang, J., Cheng, K., Zhang, L., & Wang, T. Z. (2023) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2023.105749 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
A review of swine heat production: 2003 to 2020
Ramirez, B. C., Hoff, S. J., Hayes, M. D., Brown-Brandl, T. M., Harmon, J. D., & Rohrer, G. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Animal Science · doi:10.3389/fanim.2022.908434 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Growing pig data included 145 records from 19 references (Fialho et al., 2004; Galassi et al., 2004; de Lange et al., 2006; Huynh et al., 2007; Barea et al., 2010; Labussière et al., 2011; Labussière et al., 2013; Brown-Brand et al., 2014; Campos et al., 2014a; Campos et al., 2014b; Zhang et al., 2014; Kiarie et al.,…”
BackgroundEdmonds, M. S., & Baker, D. H. (2003) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/2003.81112783x · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Evaluation of a heating protocol and stocking density impact on heatstressed fattening pigs
Prekel, L. D., Maes, D. G. D., den Broeke, A. V., Ampe, B., & Aluwé, M. (2024) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2024.101172 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Ogawa, S., Ohnishi, C., & Satoh, M. (2022) · Animal Science Journal · doi:10.1111/asj.13762 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Furthermore, more detailed modeling of heat stress considering information such as ambient temperature, relative humidity, THI, and wind speed have been studied (e.g., Cao et al., 2021; Fialho et al., 2004; Li et al., 2018), and further progress is awaited.”
BackgroundThermal comfort evaluation of three genetic lines of nursery pigs using thermal images
Brown-Brandl, T. M., Hayes, M. D., Rohrer, G. A., et al. (2022) · Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.11.002 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
An Assessment Of Heat Stress Status In Pigs And Adaptation Options In Lira District Uganda
Zaake, P. (2018) · CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Modelling Growth Performance of Pigs and Within-Room Thermal BalancePreprint
Quiniou, N., Cadéro, A., Brossard, L., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4075799
Self-citationSystematic review on mechanistic thermal models of pigs: A comparative study
Put, O. I., Maselyne, J., & Lecompte, S. (2026) · Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2026.104496
- Authors
- Fialho, F. B., van Milgen, J., Noblet, J., & Quiniou, N.
- Affiliations
- Embrapa Uva e Vinho (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Noblet, J.
- Quiniou, N.
- Venue
- Animal Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 135-148
- ISSN
- 1357-7298 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-748X
- OpenAlex
- W2885993483
- Semantic Scholar
- 421cc262d74e4a56133e52f9535eecede8b12357
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Animal Science (publishedVersion)
- HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- heat stress, pigs, heat balance model, dietary intake, thermogenesis, growth, heat loss, evaporation, convection, radiation, air humidification, heat tolerance, backfat thickness, genetic improvement, air temperature, humidity, air velocity, sensitivity analysis, model calibration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review