Cited by 11Effects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockThermoregulation and physiological responsesAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Modelling the effect of heat stress on food intake, heat production and growth in pigs

Fialho, F. B., van Milgen, J., Noblet, J., Quiniou, N.·2004·Animal Science

Abstract

Abstract A heat balance model was combined with a food intake model and a metabolism model, to form a larger model which estimates a pig’s response to heat stress. The combined model was implemented as a computer program, and used to calibrate, test and validate parts of the heat balance model. Heat transfer modes considered were convection, radiation and evaporation of water at the skin, and heating and humidification of air by breathing. Sensitivity analysis revealed a large effect of air temperature, humidity and velocity on heat loss, especially in a hot environment. It also showed that wetting of the pig’s skin is the most effective means to alleviate heat stress. The calibration procedure confirmed that characteristics related to heat tolerance in pigs must be re-evaluated, due mainly to the changes brought about by genetic improvement (such as reduced backfat thickness). The model was challenged using two different data sets. Although simulated results varied in the same way as measured data, more research is needed to determine more precisely some of the parameters. Long-term predictions were more reliable than those for short (1-day) periods.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

A heat balance model was integrated with food intake and metabolism models to predict pig responses to heat stress, implemented in STELLA and analysed in R. The combined model reproduced qualitative trends in food intake, heat production and growth, but required parameter recalibration for modern lean pigs and was less reliable for short-term temperature changes.

Key findings

  • Sensitivity analysis showed large effects of air temperature, humidity and velocity on heat loss, especially in hot conditions: a 0·1°C temperature increase decreased heat loss by 0·52% in the hot environment, while a +0·01 change in the hot wallowing parameter \(r_{ww}\) increased heat loss by 1·25%.
  • Wetting of the pig’s skin was the most effective means to alleviate heat stress; parameters related to skin wetting had the most significant effect on heat loss, especially in the hot environment.
  • Calibration against Quiniou et al. (2001) required multiplying thermoneutral food intake by 0·966, increasing skin thermal conductance from 50 to 80 W·kg\(^{1/3}\)/m\(^2\) per °C in the cold and from 200 to 320 in the heat, and increasing maximum breathing rate from 0·583 to 1·458 l/s per m\(^2\).
  • Validation against Collin et al. (2001) gave mean square prediction errors of 0·0164 for daily food intake and 8·65 for body weight, corresponding to deviations of 0·128 kg/day and 2·94 kg; bias accounted for 0·371 of food intake error and 0·515 of body weight error.

Methods

  • The heat balance model of Fialho et al. (2004) was combined with the NRC (1998) food intake model and de Lange’s (1995) metabolism model; body temperature linked the models, with environmental conditions as inputs to the heat balance model.
  • Sensitivity analysis varied environmental factors and model parameters under cold (5°C, 0·80 relative humidity) and hot (35°C, 0·40 relative humidity) conditions for a 40-kg pig with 6·2 kg protein and 6·5 kg lipid mass; default heat loss was 16,521 kJ/day cold and 9,314 kJ/day hot.
  • Calibration used six ad libitum groups from Quiniou et al. (2001) with 30- to 90-kg pigs at 12–29°C; validation challenged the model with Collin et al. (2001) (105 piglets, initial average 15·5 kg, 17 days, 19–35°C) and Giles (1992) (11 pigs, 24-h measurements), using MSPE and Theil decomposition.

Limitations

  • Stated: the food intake model does not consider gut fill and is not valid for very cold environments where animals cannot eat enough to compensate for heat loss.
  • Stated: more research is needed to determine parameters precisely, especially breathing rate, efficiency of heat loss by breathing, and thermal insulation of the skin in modern pigs; short-term effects of sudden temperature changes are not well predicted, and long-term predictions were more reliable than 1-day predictions.
  • Stated/evident: calibration changes were made arbitrarily in some cases (e.g. thermal conductance and maximum breathing rate), and the paper notes these “may or may not be correct”; no data were found on actual thermal conductance in modern lean pigs, and sensitivity results are valid only for the parameter values used.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1357729800054606

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 24 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation
    § Model description · p. 2

    Heat loss is not very sensitive to the critical body temperatures Tcb and Teb.

    “The best values for these critical body temperatures may be different, but, as demonstrated by Fialho et al . (2004), heat loss is not very sensitive to these parameters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fialho et al., 2004 source
  • Premisecitation
    § Model description · p. 2

    Heat loss is affected little by the parameter Thb.

    “Although the true value of Thb may be different, heat loss is affected little by this parameter (Fialho et al ., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fialho et al., 2004 source
  • Findingown data
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 7

    The effect of humidity on heat loss becomes increasingly important at higher temperatures, as shown by the larger slope at 35°C.

    “The effect of humidity on heat loss becomes increasingly important under higher temperatures, as may be seen by the larger slope at 35ºC.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 7

    At 15°C, relative humidity had no effect on heat loss.

    “At 15ºC, relative humidity had no effect on heat loss.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given
    § Calibration of the model · p. 9

    Despite correction for food intake in the thermoneutral zone, predicted food intake at high temperatures was lower than observed.

    “Despite the correction for food intake in the thermoneutral zone, predicted food intake at high temperatures was lower than observed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • May combine two claims. 32
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction · p. 2

    Heat balance models predict the effect of the thermal environment on variables such as body temperature.

    “Heat balance models, such as the one described by Fialho et al. (2004) and Turnpenny et al. (2000a and b), predict the effect of the thermal environment on some variables, like body temperature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fialho et al. (2004) source
    • cites Turnpenny et al. (2000a and b)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 6

    Changes in Tcb affect heat loss under cold stress, while Thb affects the animal's response in the heat.

    “The effect of changes in Tcb is evident under cold stress, while Thb changes the animal's response in the heat.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § Calibration of the model · p. 9

    At lower temperatures, observed heat production increased, while simulated values stayed approximately constant.

    “At lower temperatures, observed heat production increased, while simulated values stayed approximately constant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 7

    Changing the hot value of rwp and rvr had no influence on heat loss in the cold environment, but changing their cold value affected the response in the hot environment.

    “Changing their 'hot' value had no influence on heat loss in the cold environment, but changing their 'cold' value affected the response in the hot environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 6

    Teb slightly affects heat loss in hot environments.

    “The evaporative critical body temperature ( Teb ) affects heat loss in hot environments slightly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 5

    Under default conditions, predicted heat loss was 16,521 kJ/day in the cold environment and 9,314 kJ/day in the hot environment.

    “Under the default conditions, heat loss was 16 521 and 9 314 kJ/ day, for the cold and hot conditions, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 5

    In the cold environment, air temperature was important, but humidity had a very small effect on heat loss, due to decreased importance of evaporative losses.

    “In the cold environment, air temperature was also important, but humidity had a very small effect, due to the decreased importance of evaporative losses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 7

    Changing the cold value of rww, ka and ct had no influence on heat loss in the hot environment, but changing their hot value had a small effect in the cold environment.

    “Changing the 'cold' value of these parameters had no influence on heat loss in the hot environment, but changing their 'hot' value had a small effect in the cold environment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 5

    ka has an equally important effect on heat loss as kA but in the opposite direction.

    “Similarly, k a (the fraction of the animal's skin in contact with itself or with other animals) has an equally important effect but in the opposite direction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Challenging the model · p. 11

    The mean square prediction errors were 0.0164 for daily food intake and 8.65 for body weight, corresponding to deviations of 0.128 kg/day and 2.94 kg, respectively.

    “The mean square prediction errors (MSPE) were 0·0164 and 8·65 for daily food intake and body weight, respectively, which correspond to a deviation of 0·128 kg/day and 2·94 kg, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Challenging the model · p. 12

    Although predicted food intake behaved similarly to observed, the observed decrease in food intake at higher temperature was much more severe than predicted.

    “Although the predicted food intake behaved in a manner similar to the observed, the observed decrease in food intake at higher temperature was much more severe than was predicted.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § Challenging the model · p. 12

    The single measurement with air temperature lower than thermoneutral (19.6oC) was also lower than the corresponding thermoneutral value.

    “Curiously, the single measurement with air temperature lower than thermoneutral (19·6ºC) was also lower than the corresponding thermoneutral value.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Calibration of the model · p. 9

    Both food intake and heat production increased in colder temperatures after the thermal conductance change, similar to experimental observations.

    “Both food intake and heat production increased in colder temperatures, in a manner similar to changes in the experimental observations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Challenging the model · p. 10

    Both food intake and body weight were underestimated by the model at higher temperatures in the Collin et al. (2001) simulation.

    “Although the behaviour of simulated data was compatible with the observations, both food intake and body weight were underestimated by the model at higher temperatures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Collin et al. (2001) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Calibration of the model · p. 9

    The general shape of the food intake and heat production curves seems to be correct, with an approximately constant value around the thermoneutral zone and increased and decreased values below and above it, respectively.

    “Most important, the general shape of the food intake and heat production curves seems to be correct, with an approximately constant value around the thermoneutral zone and increased and decreased values below and above it, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Challenging the model · p. 11

    The decomposition of MSPE showed proportions due to bias, regression error and disturbances of 0.371, 0.343 and 0.286 for daily food intake and 0.515, 0.376 and 0.109 for body weight.

    “These were, respectively, 0·371, 0·343 and 0·286 for daily food intake and 0·515, 0·376 and 0·109 for body weight.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 6

    Higher critical body temperatures cause the animal to respond faster to cold stress and slower to heat stress, reducing heat loss in both cases.

    “Higher critical body temperatures mean that the animal will respond faster to cold stress and slower to heat stress, and in both cases heat loss is reduced.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Calibration of the model · p. 7

    Food intake varied with body weight according to the function described before (NRC, 1998).

    “Food intake varied with body weight according to the function described before (NRC, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites NRC, 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 7

    Using a larger value for cpb artificially increases the heat buffering capacity of the animal, allowing a stable solution with a larger time step.

    “When a larger value for c pb is used, the heat buffering capacity of the animal is artificially increased, and a stable (non-chaotic) solution may be reached with a larger time step.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 6

    rvr and kx may have significantly different values, which would substantially affect heat loss.

    “They may, therefore, have significantly different values, which would result in a substantial effect on heat loss.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Metabolism · p. 5

    Metabolizable energy intake may be calculated using relationships described by Noblet (1996), who considered energy loss as methane to be 0.004 of digestible energy and energy loss in urine as 3 kJ/g of catabolized protein.

    “Metabolizable energy intake may be calculated using the relationships described by Noblet (1996), who considered energy loss as methane to be 0·004 of digestible energy, and energy loss in the urine as 3 kJ/g of catabolized protein.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Noblet (1996)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 5

    A larger value of ka reduces the area of skin available for heat exchange and therefore reduces heat loss.

    “A larger value of k a effectively reduces the area of skin available for heat exchange, and therefore reduces heat loss.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Food intake · p. 3

    Body temperature was used to represent the combined effect of all environmental factors because it is directly affected by the thermal balance.

    “Body temperature (estimated by the heat balance model) was used to represent the combined effect of all environmental factors (temperature, humidity, air speed, etc. ), because it is directly affected by the thermal balance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § Food intake · p. 3

    The NRC model has limited accuracy, so thermoneutral food intake was corrected using experimental data to reduce errors.

    “Because the NRC model has limited accuracy, thermoneutral food intake was corrected using experimental data, as described with the calibration of the model, such that the errors in accuracy were reduced.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 7

    The model's sensitivity may change because the response may not be linear and the reference heat loss value may differ.

    “This occurs because the response may not be linear and the reference value of heat loss may be different.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 7

    At 15°C, relative humidity had no effect because conditions were within the thermoneutral zone and animals could completely compensate for humidity changes.

    “This happened because the conditions were within the thermoneutral zone, and the animals were able to completely compensate for changes resulting from varying humidity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction · p. 1

    In a cold environment, although food intake may increase, approximately all the additional energy is used to generate heat, and growth is not improved.

    “Although food intake may increase, approximately all the additional energy is used to generate heat, and growth is not improved (Black et al., 1986).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Black et al., 1986

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Sensitivity analysis · p. 5

    Advances in reducing backfat thickness suggest that ct may have changed in past years.

    “Although a 1% increase will only raise heat loss by 0·20%, the significant advances in reducing backfat thickness suggest that this parameter may have”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Modern pig genotypes are leaner and grow faster, producing more heat at the same body weight compared with genotypes of the past.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Metabolism · p. 4

    One of the most significant deficiencies of the metabolism model is food intake prediction, which was corrected for thermoneutral values.

    “One of its most significant deficiencies is food intake prediction, which was corrected for thermoneutral values, so that the focus remained on the deviations from thermoneutrality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Metabolism · p. 4

    The metabolism model described by de Lange (1995) has many limitations, some of which were corrected and some not.

    “This model has many limitations, pointed out by Black (1995), some of which were corrected, while some were not.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Black (1995) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § Food intake · p. 4

    The food intake model does not consider the limiting effect of gut fill and is not valid for very cold environments where the animal cannot eat enough to compensate for heat loss.

    “This model currently does not consider the limiting effect of gut fill on food intake. Therefore, it is not valid for very cold environments, when the animal would not be able to eat enough food to compensate for heat loss.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Model description · p. 3

    The consequence of including the simplifying assumptions (no sunlight, no conduction to floor, wall temperature equal to air, negligible heating of ingested food and water) is the same as having a slightly different air speed, temperature or humidity, shifting the thermal comfort zone on an ambient temperature scale.

    “The consequence of including these assumptions is the same as that of having a slightly different air speed, temperature or humidity, in the sense that they would shift the thermal comfort zone on an ambient temperature scale.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Animals were not exposed to sunlight.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: There was no heat exchange by conduction to the floor.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Temperature of walls was the same as air.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Heating of ingested food and water was negligible.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Calibration of the model · p. 9

    The reduction in tolerance to cold could have been caused by reduced tissue insulation.

    “which could have been caused by reduced tissue insulation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Advances in pig breeding have led to leaner animals, which have less fat acting as a thermal insulator under the skin surface.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Calibration of the model · p. 9

    Changing many parameters by a small amount or one parameter by a large amount would yield similar results (an increase in heat loss under heat stress).

    “For the purpose of testing the model, changing many parameters by a small amount or one parameter by a large amount would yield similar results (i.e. , an increase in heat loss under heat stress).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Challenging the model · p. 12

    This cessation of eating is unlikely to be maintained if the experiment was conducted for a longer period of time.

    “which is unlikely to be maintained if the experiment was conducted for a longer period of time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Conclusions · p. 12

    The evaluated heat balance model may be used to predict heat loss from a pig to its environment and changes in a conceptual body temperature.

    “The evaluated heat balance model may be used to predict heat loss from a pig to its environment and changes in a conceptual body temperature.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Challenging the model · p. 10

    Using the equations described by Noblet (1996), digestible energy of the Collin et al. diet was calculated to be 14.91 MJ/kg.

    “Using the equations described by Noblet (1996), digestible energy was calculated to be 14·91 MJ/kg.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Noblet (1996)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Calibration of the model · p. 9

    It is likely that a combination of factors is responsible for the adaptation of the experimental animals to hot conditions.

    “It is likely that a combination of factors is responsible for this adaptation”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Challenging the model · p. 11

    The bias (underestimation of observed values) is responsible for a large proportion of the error in food intake prediction, and for most of the error in body weight prediction.

    “This indicates that the bias (the underestimation of the observed values) is responsible for a large proportion of the error in food intake prediction, and for most of the error in body weight prediction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Challenging the model · p. 10

    The experiment of Collin et al. (2001) involved 105 piglets with an initial average body weight of 15.5 kg, raised for 17 days under temperatures between 19 and 35°C with intervals of 2°C.

    “In this experiment, a total of 105 piglets with an initial average body weight of 15·5 kg were raised for 17 days under one of a series of experimental temperatures ranging between 19 and 35ºC with intervals of 2ºC”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Collin et al. (2001) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Conclusions · p. 12

    Mean body temperature synthesizes the effect of all environmental factors that affect an animal's thermal comfort in a single value.

    “It synthesizes the effect of all environmental factors that affect an animal's thermal comfort in a single value.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Challenging the model · p. 11

    In the Giles (1992) experiments, a total of 11 pigs were exposed to different thermal environments for 24 h, and voluntary food intake was measured.

    “In these experiments, a total of 11 pigs were exposed to different thermal environments for a period of 24 h, and voluntary food intake was measured.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Giles (1992)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Calibration of the model · p. 9

    The experimental animals were able to dissipate more heat than was predicted by the model, and could therefore maintain a greater heat production and higher food intake level.

    “In order to maintain the same body temperature under these environmental conditions, the experimental animals were able to dissipate more heat than was predicted by the model. They could therefore maintain a greater heat production, and consequently a higher food intake level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Challenging the model · p. 12

    The surgical procedure may have made the animals more susceptible to stress.

    “which may have made the animals more susceptible to stress.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Challenging the model · p. 12

    The pigs used in the Giles (1992) experiment may have been more sensitive to heat stress than the ones used to calibrate the model.

    “It may be that the pigs used in this experiment were more sensitive to heat stress than the ones used to calibrate the model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Giles (1992)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Challenging the model · p. 10

    The underestimation may indicate that the parameters of the model may need to be better estimated, or that the animals used in the experiment were genetically more resistant to heat than the animals used to calibrate the model.

    “This may indicate that the parameters of the model may need to be better estimated, or that the animals used in the experiment were genetically more resistant to heat than the animals used to calibrate the model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
46 of 46
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Homeothermic animals maintain body temperature within a narrow range despite large fluctuations in ambient conditions.

    “Homeothermic animals are able to maintain body temperature within a narrow range of values, despite large fluctuations in ambient conditions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Homeothermic animals maintain a balance between heat production and heat loss to the environment.

    “They do this by maintaining a balance between heat production and heat loss to the environment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In a comfortable thermal situation, heat production is more or less independent of ambient temperature, and environmental variations are compensated by physiological regulation mechanisms maintaining heat loss at an approximately constant level.

    “In a comfortable thermal situation, heat production is more or less independent of ambient temperature, and environmental variations are compensated by physiological regulation mechanisms which maintain heat loss at an approximately constant level.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In a cold environment, heat production increases to compensate for greater heat loss.

    “In a cold environment, heat production increases in order to compensate for a greater heat loss.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In a hot environment, pigs attempt to maximize heat loss by breathing faster and minimize heat production by reducing food intake.

    “In a hot environment, pigs attempt to maximize heat loss (by breathing faster) and to minimize heat production (by reducing food intake).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Variations in the thermal environment cause minor changes in mean body temperature, to which the animal's thermal regulation mechanism responds.

    “The model uses the concept that variations in the thermal environment cause minor changes in mean body temperature ( Tb , ºC), to which the animal's thermal regulation mechanism responds.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The animal's thermal regulation responses attempt to maintain body temperature as close as possible to normal physiological levels.

    “These responses attempt to maintain body temperature as close as possible to normal physiological levels.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Ambient temperature alone is not sufficient to characterize the animal's sensation of heat or cold; it also depends on humidity, wind, radiation, body size and other factors.

    “Ambient temperature alone is not sufficient to characterize the animal's sensation of heat or cold, which also depends on humidity, wind, radiation, body size and other factors.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Within the thermoneutral zone, mean body temperature stays between the lower critical body temperature (Tcb) and the evaporative critical body temperature (Teb).

    “Within the thermoneutral zone, mean body temperature is considered to stay between the lower critical body temperature ( Tcb ) and the evaporative critical body temperature ( Teb ).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Within the evaporative zone, mean body temperature is maintained between Teb and the upper critical body temperature (Thb), and feedback mechanisms based on increased evaporative loss and reduced food intake are activated.

    “Within this range, mean body temperature is considered to be maintained between Teb and the upper critical body temperature ( Thb ), and feedback mechanisms based on increased evaporative loss and reduced food intake are activated.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Animals were not exposed to sunlight.

    “animals were not exposed to sunlight”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There was no heat exchange by conduction to the floor.

    “there was no heat exchange by conduction to the floor”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Temperature of walls was the same as air.

    “temperature of walls was the same as air”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Heating of ingested food and water was negligible.

    “heating of ingested food and water was negligible”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The NRC food intake model referred to pigs in a thermoneutral environment.

    “Although not stated by NRC (1998), it was assumed that this model referred to pigs in a thermoneutral environment.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Voluntary food intake is reduced under heat stress and increased in cold conditions, varying with body temperature.

    “Voluntary food intake was considered to be reduced under heat stress and increased in cold conditions, varying with body temperature as shown in Figure 3.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Conceptually, food intake increases linearly as body temperature drops below Tcb; in the thermoneutral zone, food intake is constant; between Teb and Thb, food intake decreases linearly and becomes zero above Thb.

    “Conceptually, food intake increases linearly as body temperature drops below Tcb . In the thermoneutral zone, body temperature remains between Tcb and Teb and food intake is constant. Between Teb and Thb , food intake decreases linearly and becomes zero at body temperatures above Thb .”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The maintenance energy requirement (Em) is 1000 kJ/day per kg^0.6.

    “Therefore, Em was assumed to be 1000 kJ/day per kg 0·6”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The energy costs of protein and lipid deposition are 37.0 and 47.7 kJ/g, respectively.

    “the energy cost of protein ( Epd ) and lipid ( Eld ) deposition were assumed to be 37·0 and 47·7 kJ/g, respectively (Noblet et al., 1999).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    An additional energy requirement is added to maintenance under cold stress so that all extra food consumed is used to generate heat.

    “An additional energy requirement was added to maintenance when the animal was under cold stress, so that all the extra food consumed under these conditions would be used to generate heat.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The conversion of extra energy into heat occurs mainly by shivering.

    “The conversion of extra energy into heat occurs mainly by shivering.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Modern pig genotypes are leaner and grow faster, producing more heat at the same body weight compared with genotypes of the past.

    “Modern pig genotypes are leaner and grow faster, producing more heat at the same body weight, when compared with genotypes of the past.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    rww may vary significantly if pigs have access to water.

    “this parameter may vary significantly if the pigs have access to water.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Advances in pig breeding have led to leaner animals, which have less fat acting as a thermal insulator under the skin surface.

    “Advances in pig breeding have led to leaner animals, which have less fat acting as a thermal insulator under the skin surface.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Initial protein (P0) and lipid (L0) mass of the animals in the Collin et al. (2001) experiment were equal.

    “Assuming initial protein ( P0 ) and lipid ( L0 ) mass were equal”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Temperature of the surrounding radiating surfaces is the same as air temperature.

    “Temperature of the surrounding radiating surfaces ( ° C) is assumed to be the same as air temperature:”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Exhaled air is saturated with water vapour.

    “Enthalpy of exhaled air (kJ/kg) assumes it is saturated with water vapour:”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There is no sunlight and no contact with the floor, so the fraction of body surface exposed to a shaded environment is all the skin not in contact with other animals.

    “Fraction of body surface exposed to a shaded environment, assuming no sunlight and no contact with the floor, is all the skin which is not in contact with other animals:”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most parameters related to the thermal environment were determined a few decades ago.

    “Most of the parameters related to the thermal environment were determined a few decades ago”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Changes in body temperature are a function of heat production and heat loss.

    “The fundamental concept in the model is that changes in body temperature are a function of heat production and heat loss:”
30 of 30

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Acceptance date precedes receipt date

    Minor

    The paper states that it was accepted on 27 February 2003, before it was received on 10 July 2003.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Giles L. R. 1992. Energy expenditure of growing pigs at high ambient temperatures. Ph. D. thesis, University of Sydney.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fialho, F. B., van Milgen, J., Noblet, J., & Quiniou, N.
Affiliations
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (BR)
Corresponding author
  • Noblet, J.
  • Quiniou, N.
Venue
Animal Science
Published
2004-04
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
135-148
ISSN
  • 1357-7298 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-748X
OpenAlex
W2885993483
Cited by
11
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Animal Science (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
heat stress, pigs, heat balance model, dietary intake, thermogenesis, growth, heat loss, evaporation, convection, radiation, air humidification, heat tolerance, backfat thickness, genetic improvement, air temperature, humidity, air velocity, sensitivity analysis, model calibration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review