Cited by 56Religious Studies and Spiritual PracticesStudy and Philosophy of ReligionReligion and Society Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Claiming Knowledge: Strategies of Epistemology from Theosophy to the New Age

Hammer, Olav·2004·BRILL eBooks

Abstract

This volume deals with the transformation of religious creativity in the late modern West. Its point of departure is a set of esoteric beliefs, from Theosophy to the New Age. It shows how these traditions have adapted to the cultural givens of each successive epoch. The claims of each movement have been buttressed by drawing on various structural characteristics of late modernity. The advance of science has resulted in attempts to claim scientific status for religious beliefs. Globalization has given rise to massive loans from other cultures, but also to various strategies to radically reinterpret foreign elements. Individualism has led to an increasing reliance on experience as a source of legitimacy. The analytical tools applied to understanding religious modernization shed light on changes that are fundamentally reshaping many religious traditions. This publication has also been published in hardback, please click here for details.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/9789047403371

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hammer points to a typical characteristic of alternative religious worldviews: the terms 'energy' and 'vital force' are semantically fused.

    “In this brief paragraph, Hammer points to a typical characteristic of alternative religious worldviews that is not self-evident: the terms 'energy' and 'vital force' are semantically fused.”
  • Around 1919, Bailey claimed to be in contact with a master she referred to as 'the Tibetan' (later identified as Djwhal Khul).

    “Around 1919, Bailey claimed to be in contact with a master she referred to as 'the Tibetan' (later identified as Djwhal Khul) (Hammer 2004, 384).”
  • Bailey's books made original contributions, including her doctrine of the 'seven rays', interpretations of esoteric astrology, and millenarian-messianic beliefs.

    “While theosophically conservative, her books have made a number of original contributions, including her doctrine of the 'seven rays', interpretations of esoteric astrology, and millenarian-messianic beliefs (Hammer 2004, 65).”
  • Bailey's cosmology is decidedly non-scientific.

    “Bailey's cosmology is decidedly non-scientific”
  • Bailey believed the evolution of the universe and biological species to be the result of a creative, divine drive.

    “Bailey believed the evolution of the universe and the biological species to be the result of a creative, divine drive”

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hammer, O.
Corresponding author
Hammer, Olav
Venue
BRILL eBooks
Publisher
BRILL
Published
2004-01-01
OpenAlex
W4213412055
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7
FWCI
0.00
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
esotericism, Theosophy, New Age, religious modernization, late modernity, religion and globalization, individualism, religious experience, religious creativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review