THE RELATIVE CHRONOLOGY OF THE FIRST INTERMEDIATE PERIOD
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Based on a weak argument of the paucity of archaeological traces, the conventional chronology suggests a significantly shorter average Herakleopolitan reign of ≈ 125 : 18 = 7 years.
“Based on a weak argument of the paucity of archaeological traces (as correctly pointed out by [Seidlmayer 2006, 165]), the conventional chronology suggests a significantly shorter average Herakleopolitan reign of ≈ 125 : 18 = 7 years (see: [v. Beckerath 1997, 144-145]).”
From Sothic Dating of the Egyptian Old Kingdom (2024) · cites this paper as Seidlmayer 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sothic Dating of the Egyptian Old Kingdom
Puchkov, A. (2024) · The World of the Orient · doi:10.15407/orientw2024.01.042
- Authors
- Seidlmayer, S. J.
- Corresponding author
- Seidlmayer, Stephan J.
- Venue
- Ancient Egyptian Chronology
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Pages
- 159-167
- OpenAlex
- W2220838280
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- First Intermediate Period, chronology, ancient Egypt, Middle Kingdom
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
