The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Between Sectarian and Non-Sectarian: The Case of the Apocryphon of Joshua
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some documents from Qumran attest to similar ideas to those of Jubilees in calendrical matters, for example the Apocryphon of Joshua.
“Some documents from Qumran attest to similar ideas to those of Jubilees in calendrical matters, for example the Apocryphon of Joshua (Dimant 2005).”
From Qumran Calendars: A Survey of Scholarship 1980—2007 (2008) · cites this paper as Dimant 2005
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qumran Calendars: A Survey of Scholarship 1980—2007
Ben-Dov, J., & Saulnier, S. (2008) · Currents in Biblical Research · doi:10.1177/1476993x08094026 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Dimant, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Haifa (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Dimant, Devorah
- Venue
- Reworking the Bible: Apocryphal and Related Texts at Qumran
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Pages
- 105-134
- OpenAlex
- W4238234529
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical and Linguistic Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Byzantine Studies and History
- Keywords
- sectarianism, apocryphal literature, early Christianity, New Testament canon
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
