Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning
Abstract
Over the last decade the notion of ‘threshold concepts’ has proved influential around the world as a powerful means of exploring and discussing the key points of transformation that students experience in their higher education courses and the ‘troublesome knowledge’ that these often present. Threshold concepts provoke in the learner a state of 'liminality' in which transformation takes place, requiring the integration of new understanding and the letting go of previous learning stances. Insights gained by learners as they cross thresholds can be exhilarating but might also be unsettling, requiring an uncomfortable shift in identity, or, paradoxically, a sense of loss. The liminal space can be a suspended state of partial understanding, or’stuck place', in which understanding approximates to a kind of 'mimicry'. Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning substantially increases the empirical evidence for threshold concepts across a large number of disciplinary contexts and from the higher education sectors of many countries. This new volume develops further theoretical perspectives and provides fresh pedagogical directions. It will be of interest to teachers, practitioners and managers in all disciplines as well as to educational researchers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Learners need threshold concepts to move beyond liminality.
“This is a state of liminality, and the learner needs to have some threshold concepts so that they can move further (Land et al. 2008;Meyer et al. 2010).”
From Adult learning theories: Implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83 (2013) · cites this paper as Meyer et al. 2010
A novice stands at the threshold, not knowing what to expect and sometimes not knowing what to look at; this is liminality.
“A novice stands at the threshold, not quite knowing what to expect, and sometimes not even knowing what they are supposed to be looking at.This is a state of liminality, and the learner needs to have some threshold concepts so that they can move further (Land et al. 2008;Meyer et al. 2010).”
From Adult learning theories: Implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83 (2013) · cites this paper as Meyer et al. 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Taylor, D. C. M., & Hamdy, H. (2013) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2013.828153 · Cited by 1,176 · see citing works
- Authors
- Meyer, J. H. F., Land, R., & Baillie, C.
- Venue
- BRILL eBooks
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2010-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W659595324
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 24.91
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- threshold concepts, transformative learning, liminality, troublesome knowledge, university teaching, identity transformation, mimicry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review