The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nordic Journal of African Studies
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a discussion of Akan noun-noun compounds and a Construction Morphology account of their properties.Noun-noun compounds are the most studied type of compounds cross-linguistically, with studies revealing interesting issues about their nature, including their productivity, the variable semantic relations between the constituents, and the overall interpretation of the compounds.However, there is currently no study dedicated to the morphological and semantic properties of noun-noun compounds in Akan.Existing studies focus mainly on the phonology of Akan compounds and on other features like exocentricity in relation to which aspects of noun-noun compounds are discussed.Based on a dataset of over 200 Akan noun-noun compounds, this paper identifies various classes, including endocentric and exocentric types based on whether or not a head constituent is present.It is shown that the endocentric types are predominantly right-headed, consistent with observed crosslinguistic patterns.The range of possible interpretations of newly formed Akan noun-noun compounds also varies, depending on the semantic relation between the constituents and the pragmatic context, although for established compounds, there seem to be generally recognized fixed relations between the constituents that mediate their conventionalized interpretation.However, even they may be subject to other context-specific interpretations on occasion.Thus, for the Construction Morphology account, the relation between the constituents is specified as R at an abstract level, and spelt out concretely for compounds individually.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hegemonic masculinity: combining theory and practice in gender interventions
Jewkes, R., Morrell, R., Hearn, J., Lundqvist, E., Blackbeard, D., Lindegger, G., Quayle, M., Sikweyiya, Y., & Gottzén, L. (2015) · Culture, Health & Sexuality · doi:10.1080/13691058.2015.1085094 · Cited by 438
In pots we trust. The processing of clay and symbols in sub-Saharan Africa
Gosselain, O. P. (1999) · Journal of Material Culture · doi:10.1177/135918359900400205 · Cited by 88
Chirikure, S. (2014) · African Archaeological Review · doi:10.1007/s10437-014-9171-6 · Cited by 42
For an anthropology of destiny
Elliot, A., & Menin, L. (2018) · HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory · doi:10.1086/698223 · Cited by 38
Cycle of Bad Governance and Corruption: The Rise of Boko Haram in Nigeria
Suleiman, M. N., & Aminul Karim, M. (2015) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244015576053 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Venue
- African Studies Companion Online
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2014-08-08
- OpenAlex
- W4231236808
- Cited by
- 1,016
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nordic Journal of African Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/_afco_asc_732
- The paper
- Nordic Journal of African Studies. (2014). African Studies Companion Online. https://doi.org/10.1163/_afco_asc_732
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.