The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Les Alchandreana primitifs: Étude sur les plus anciens traités astrologiques latins d'origine arabe (Xe siècle)
Abstract
It is well known that medieval Europe owes most of its scientific learning to the translations of Arabic treatises made in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. The earliest Arabic infiltrations in Latin science are however much older. They can be traced back to the tenth century and to the making, in Catalonia, of a large corpus of astrological treatises: the Alchandreana. Based mainly on Arabic sources, but also on Hebrew and Latin sources, the Alchandreana constitute an exceptional testimony of cross-cultural exchanges between Christian, Arabic and Jewish scholars before the turn of the first millenium. This book offers a historical study, a technical analysis and a critical edition of the whole corpus. Brill's Texts and Sources in Intellectual History, vol. 2
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This now brings us to the longest incident-based prognostic table in any language known to date: chapter 40 of the thirteenth-century Kitāb al-Tabṣira fī ˁilm al-nujūm by al-Ashraf ˁUmar, which includes a table with no less than 300 incidents in its oldest, fourteenth-century manuscript witness.41”
From Medieval Divination by Unexpected Incidents: The Tabula prenostica Salomonis (2023) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cited by
Medieval Meteorology: Forecasting the Weather from Aristotle to the Almanac
Lawrence-Mathers, A. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108289948 · Cited by 9
Béziers as an Astronomical Center for Jews and Christians in the Mid-Twelfth Century
Burnett, C. (2017) · Aleph · doi:10.2979/aleph.17.2.0197 · Cited by 1
Medieval Divination by Unexpected Incidents: The Tabula prenostica Salomonis
Hertogh, T., van Rhijn, C., Schalekamp, B., & Schmidl, P. G. (2023) · International Journal of Divination and Prognostication · doi:10.1163/25899201-bja10003
Metadata
- Authors
- Juste, D.
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2007-04-24
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
