The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wind And Smoke: Giving Up The Ghost Of Enkidu, Comprehending Enkidu’s Ghosts
Abstract
The Epic of Gilgamesh is the best known work of literature from ancient Iraq, and rightly so. Its 3,000 or so lines relate the story of the legendary king of Uruk and his friendship and adventures with his close companion Enkidu, whose subsequent death initiated the grieving Gilgameshs vain quest for immortality. The Akkadian epic is loosely based on a group of earlier Sumerian stories about Gilgamesh, but includes as well much that is not known from the Sumerian tradition. The ancients were very concerned about the ghost that was released after death. The ghost of Sumerian and Akkadian sources, then, seems to be something akin to an immortal soul, an integral part of the living person that takes on an independent role only after death. Keywords: Akkadian sources; enkidu; Gilgamesh; Sumerian tradition
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This purgatorial, temporary punishment within the Christian hellscape receives considerable attention in late antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, but it is unclear when it acquired the name Purgatory and when it was understood to be a distinct place.
“This purgatorial, temporary punishment within the Christian hellscape receives considerable attention in late antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, but it is unclear when it acquired the name 'Purgatory', and when it was understood to be a distinct place.”
From The Rise of Postmortem Retribution in China and the West (2010) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
“They Enjoy Syrup and Ghee at Tables of Silver and Gold”: Infant Loss in Ancient Mesopotamia
de Valk, J. P. J. (2016) · Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient · doi:10.1163/15685209-12341412 · Cited by 25
Matijević, K. (2018) · Klio · doi:10.1515/klio-2018-0124 · Cited by 21
Women and the Interpretation of Dreams In Sumerian and Akkadian Literature
Konstantopoulos, G. (2022) · Journal of Cuneiform Studies · doi:10.1086/719863 · Cited by 17
The Rise of Postmortem Retribution in China and the West
Bernstein, A. E., & Katz, P. R. (2010) · The Medieval History Journal · doi:10.1177/097194581001300202 · Cited by 9
Metaphors of Death and Resurrection in the Qurʾan
Galadari, A. (2021) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781350244559 · Cited by 3
Atraḫasīs, behind the First Sin That Cried to Heaven and Related Matters
Winitzer, A. (2023) · Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions · doi:10.1163/15692124-12341337 · Cited by 2
(2021) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781350244559.0009
Heinrich, A. C. (2024) · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.9024
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, J. S.
- Corresponding author
- Cooper, Jerrold S.
- Venue
- Rethinking Ghosts in World Religions
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2009-01-01
- Pages
- 23-32
- OpenAlex
- W828250228
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- Epic of Gilgamesh, Enkidu, ghosts, afterlife, immortality of the soul, Akkadian literature, death and mourning, immortality, Uruk
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review