Cited by 0Biblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Egypt and ArchaeologyClassical Antiquity Studies

Rameses II And The Exodus: A Case Of Mistaken Identity

Merrill, Eugene H.·2010·Homeland and Exile

Abstract

This chapter focuses on reading a narrative familar with identity of the various pharaohs of the early chapters of Exodus, the date of the Exodus, or even the historical factuality of the recorded events. It locates the canonical setting and the Bible's own historical background of the three major parts of the larger narrative (namely, the oppression, the Moses birth narrative, and the Exodus). The chapter addresses traditional understandings based on the interpretation of extra-biblical sources. It demonstrates that the biblical portrayal is at odds with the consensus model. The pharaoh of the original oppression would therefore have been someone other then Rameses, perhaps Amosis, the founder of Dynasty 18, or one of the Thutmosides. The king of Egypt of verse 15 (Rameses II by the consensus view) carried the program of oppression further by commanding the extermination of newborn male children. Keywords: Exodus narrative; Moses birth narrative; pharaoh; Rameses II

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/ej.9789004178892.i-648.144

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Authors
Merrill, E. H.
Corresponding author
Merrill, Eugene H.
Venue
Homeland and Exile
Publisher
BRILL
Published
2010-01-01
Pages
533-545
OpenAlex
W915434187
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
Keywords
Ramesses II, Exodus narrative, biblical historiography, consensus model, biblical chronology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review