Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 515

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Physiologic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and mask pressure support during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Appendini, L, Patessio, A, Zanaboni, S, Carone, M, Gukov, B, Donner, C F, Rossi, A·1994·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

To assess physiologic effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during noninvasive pressure support ventilation (PSV) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), we measured in seven patients the breathing pattern, lung mechanics, diaphragmatic effort (PTPdi), and arterial blood gases under four conditions: (1) spontaneous breathing (SB); (2) CPAP; (3) PSV of 10 cm H2O; and (4) PSV plus PEEP (PEEP + PSV). CPAP and PEEP were set between 80 and 90% of dynamic intrinsic PEEP (PEEPidyn) measured during SB and PSV, respectively. PEEPidyn was obtained (1) from the decrease in pleural pressure (delta Ppl) preceding inspiration, and (2) subtracting the fall in gastric pressure (delta Pga) caused by relaxation of the abdominal muscles from the delta Ppl decrease. Abdominal muscle activity made PEEPidyn overestimated in almost all instances (p < 0.0001). PSV increased minute ventilation, improved gas exchange, and decreased PTPdi. PEEP added to PSV, likewise CPAP compared with SB, further significantly decreased the diaphragmatic effort (PTPdi went from 322 +/- 111 to 203 +/- 63 cm H2O.s) by counterbalancing PEEPidyn, which went from 5.4 +/- 4.0 to 3.1 +/- 2.3 cm H2O. These data support the use of low levels of PEEP (80 to 90% of PEEPidyn) to treat acute exacerbation of COPD by means of mask PSV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.149.5.8173743

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 515

Metadata

Authors
Appendini, L., Patessio, A., Zanaboni, S., Carone, M., Gukov, B., Donner, C. F., & Rossi, A.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1994-05
Volume
149
Issue
5
Pages
1069-1076
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2146020538
Cited by
515
References
0
FWCI
23.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiologic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and mask pressure support during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.149.5.8173743
The paper
Appendini, L., Patessio, A., Zanaboni, S., Carone, M., Gukov, B., Donner, C. F., & Rossi, A. (1994). Physiologic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and mask pressure support during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.149.5.8173743

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.