The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physiologic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and mask pressure support during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Abstract
To assess physiologic effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during noninvasive pressure support ventilation (PSV) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), we measured in seven patients the breathing pattern, lung mechanics, diaphragmatic effort (PTPdi), and arterial blood gases under four conditions: (1) spontaneous breathing (SB); (2) CPAP; (3) PSV of 10 cm H2O; and (4) PSV plus PEEP (PEEP + PSV). CPAP and PEEP were set between 80 and 90% of dynamic intrinsic PEEP (PEEPidyn) measured during SB and PSV, respectively. PEEPidyn was obtained (1) from the decrease in pleural pressure (delta Ppl) preceding inspiration, and (2) subtracting the fall in gastric pressure (delta Pga) caused by relaxation of the abdominal muscles from the delta Ppl decrease. Abdominal muscle activity made PEEPidyn overestimated in almost all instances (p < 0.0001). PSV increased minute ventilation, improved gas exchange, and decreased PTPdi. PEEP added to PSV, likewise CPAP compared with SB, further significantly decreased the diaphragmatic effort (PTPdi went from 322 +/- 111 to 203 +/- 63 cm H2O.s) by counterbalancing PEEPidyn, which went from 5.4 +/- 4.0 to 3.1 +/- 2.3 cm H2O. These data support the use of low levels of PEEP (80 to 90% of PEEPidyn) to treat acute exacerbation of COPD by means of mask PSV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kramer, N., Meyer, T. J., Meharg, J., Cece, R. D., & Hill, N. S. (1995) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.151.6.7767523 · Cited by 915
Time of non-invasive ventilation
Nava, S., Navalesi, P., & Conti, G. (2006) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-005-0050-0 · Cited by 144
Noninvasive vs Conventional Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure
Honrubia, T., García López, F. J., Franco, N., Mas, M., Guevara, M., Daguerre, M., Alía, I., Algora, A., & Galdos, P. (2005) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.128.6.3916 · Cited by 114
Effect of Lung Volume Reduction Surgery on Neuromechanical Coupling of the Diaphragm
LAGHI, F., JUBRAN, A., TOPELI, A., FAHEY, P. J., GARRITY, E. R., ARCIDI, J. M., de PINTO, D. J., EDWARDS, L. C., & TOBIN, M. J. (1998) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.157.2.9705082 · Cited by 108
Gorini, M., Misuri, G., Duranti, R., Iandelli, I., Mancini, M., & Scano, G. (1997) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.52.4.355 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Appendini, L., Patessio, A., Zanaboni, S., Carone, M., Gukov, B., Donner, C. F., & Rossi, A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1069-1076
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2146020538
- Cited by
- 515
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiologic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and mask pressure support during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.149.5.8173743
- The paper
- Appendini, L., Patessio, A., Zanaboni, S., Carone, M., Gukov, B., Donner, C. F., & Rossi, A. (1994). Physiologic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and mask pressure support during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.149.5.8173743
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.