Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prevalence of occupational asthma due to latex among hospital personnel.

Vandenplas, O, Delwiche, J P, Evrard, G, Aimont, P, van der Brempt, X, Jamart, J, Delaunois, L·1995·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Latex has been documented as causing immediate hypersensitivity reactions ranging from contact urticaria to severe anaphylaxis. Latex proteins may also act as airborne allergens causing rhinitis and asthma. The prevalence of occupational asthma due to latex gloves among health care workers is unknown. We surveyed the employees of a primary care hospital including nurses (n = 201), members of the cleaning staff (n = 50), and laboratory technologists (n = 38). In the initial part of the study, a questionnaire and skin-prick tests with latex and common inhalant allergens were administered to 273 of 289 (94%) members of the target population. Thirteen of the 273 subjects (4.7%; 95% CI: 2.6 to 8.1%) showed skin reactivity to latex. All latex-sensitive subjects reported glove-related urticaria, which was associated with rhinoconjunctivitis in 12 subjects and asthma in five subjects. No subject had a history suggestive of occupational asthma among those who had negative skin tests to latex. In the second part of the study, a histamine inhalation challenge was performed on 12 of 13 latex-sensitive subjects, including the five subjects with a history of occupational asthma. These 12 subjects demonstrated significant bronchial hyperresponsiveness. All underwent specific inhalation challenges with latex gloves in the laboratory. Seven subjects developed a significant bronchial response (four immediate and three dual reactions) to latex glove exposure. We conclude that occupational asthma due to latex occurred in 2.5% (95% CI: 1.0 to 5.2%) of hospital employees. Widespread use of latex gloves should therefore be considered a significant risk to the respiratory health of hospital employees.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.151.1.7812572

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Vandenplas, O., Delwiche, J. P., Evrard, G., Aimont, P., van der Brempt, X., Jamart, J., & Delaunois, L.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1995-01
Volume
151
Issue
1
Pages
54-60
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2150005789
Cited by
252
References
0
FWCI
24.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of occupational asthma due to latex among hospital personnel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.151.1.7812572
The paper
Vandenplas, O., Delwiche, J. P., Evrard, G., Aimont, P., van der Brempt, X., Jamart, J., & Delaunois, L. (1995). Prevalence of occupational asthma due to latex among hospital personnel. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.151.1.7812572

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.