Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Semirecumbent position protects from pulmonary aspiration but not completely from gastroesophageal reflux in mechanically ventilated patients.

Orozco-Levi, M, Torres, A, Ferrer, M, Piera, C, el-Ebiary, M, de la Bellacasa, J P, Rodriguez-Roisin, R·1995·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of two body positions (supine and semirecumbency) on the dynamics of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in 15 patients requiring mechanical ventilation and having a nasogastric tube in place. Samples of gastric contents, pharyngeal and bronchial secretions, and blood were obtained at baseline and every hour during a period of 5 h after nasogastric tube isotopic instillation of 37 megabecquerels of Tc99m. Radioactivity counting (RAc) was performed using a gamma counter with correction for decay. Irrespective of the body position, all patients showed at 3, 4, and 5 h after the isotope instillation a significant increase in RAc of the oropharyngeal contents (p < 0.05, each), indicating GER. Although RAc values in the pharynx were higher in supine from 1 through 4 h (p < 0.05), at the end of the study (5 h) the values did not differ between each position. Likewise, the slopes of the regression lines of sequential oropharyngeal RAc values were not different between each position (0.39 +/- 0.09 versus 0.45 +/- 0.11, respectively). In contrast, RAc values in bronchial secretions were higher at 5 h in the supine position compared with baseline (p < 0.05) and to semirecumbency (p < 0.01). These results strongly support that GER in mechanically ventilated patients with a nasogastric tube is a feature occurring irrespective of body position. Semirecumbent position does not protect completely from GER and subsequently from oropharyngeal colonization from gastric origin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.152.4.7551400

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Orozco-Levi, M., Torres, A., Ferrer, M., Piera, C., el-Ebiary, M., de la Bellacasa, J. P., & Rodriguez-Roisin, R.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1995-10
Volume
152
Issue
4
Pages
1387-1390
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1992441854
Cited by
331
References
1
FWCI
24.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semirecumbent position protects from pulmonary aspiration but not completely from gastroesophageal reflux in mechanically ventilated patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.152.4.7551400
The paper
Orozco-Levi, M., Torres, A., Ferrer, M., Piera, C., el-Ebiary, M., de la Bellacasa, J. P., & Rodriguez-Roisin, R. (1995). Semirecumbent position protects from pulmonary aspiration but not completely from gastroesophageal reflux in mechanically ventilated patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.152.4.7551400

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.