Cited by 223Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNosocomial Infections in ICUCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis

The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and success in nutrient delivery with gastric versus small intestinal feeding: A randomized clinical trial

Kearns, Patrick J., Chin, Donna, Mueller, Lucie, Wallace, Karen, Jensen, William A., Kirsch, Carl M.·2000·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enteral feeding provides nutrients for patients who require endotracheal tubes and mechanical ventilation. There is a presumed increase in the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with tube feeding. This has stimulated the development of procedures for duodenal intubation and small intestinal (SI) feeding as primary prophylaxes to prevent VAP. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rate of VAP and adequacy of nutrient delivery with gastric (G) vs. SI feeding. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: A medical intensive care unit of a county hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 44 endotracheally intubated, mechanically ventilated patients requiring enteral nutrition. INTERVENTION: Subjects were randomized to receive enteral nutrition via G or SI feeding. Protocols directed the placement of the feeding tube and the infusion of enteral nutrition and defined the radiographic and clinical criteria for a diagnosis of VAP. MEASUREMENTS AND OUTCOMES: The incidence of VAP and the adequacy of nutritional supplementation were prospectively followed. The relative risk of VAP with SI was 1.1 (95% confidence interval 0.96-2.44) compared with G. The SI group received a greater percentage of their caloric requirements (SI 69 +/- 7% vs. G 47 +/- 7%, mean +/- SEM, p < .05). Mortality did not differ between G (26 +/- 9%) and SI (24 +/- 10, p = .86). CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear difference in the incidence of VAP in SI compared with G enteral nutrition. Patients given feeding into the SI do receive higher calorie and protein intakes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00003246-200006000-00007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an ICU population fed through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, bolus and continuous tube feeding achieved the same gastric volumes, insulin requirements, time to goal therapy or calorie intake.

    “In an ICU population fed through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, bolus and continuous tube feeding achieved the same gastric volumes, insulin requirements, time to goal therapy or calorie intake (83).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kearns, P. J., Chin, D., Mueller, L., Wallace, K., Jensen, W. A., & Kirsch, C. M.
Affiliations
Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2000-06
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
1742-1746
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088026862
Cited by
223
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
14.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Keywords
ventilator-associated pneumonia, enteral nutrition, gastric tube feeding, duodenal intubation, mechanical ventilation, endotracheal intubation, nutritional adequacy, energy intake, intensive care unit patients, mortality
MeSH terms
Enteral Nutrition, Female, Humans, Intestine, Small, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Prospective Studies, Ventilators, Mechanical, Stomach, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review