The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pneumonia in intubated patients: role of respiratory airway care.
Abstract
In order to assess potential risk factors for pneumonia within the first 8 d of ventilation, we studied 83 consecutive intubated patients undergoing continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions (CASS). Multivariate analysis showed the protective effect of antibiotic use (relative risk [RR] = 0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01 to 0.71), whereas failure of the CASS technique (RR = 5.29; 95% CI = 1.24 to 22.64) was associated with a greater risk of pneumonia. In addition, there was a trend toward a higher risk of pneumonia (RR = 2.57; 95% CI = 0.78 to 8.03) among patients with persistent intracuff pressures below 20 cm H2O. The remaining factors analyzed were not significant. Failure of CASS did not influence the development of pneumonia among patients undergoing antibiotic treatment (33.0% versus 38.5%, p > 0.20), but was strongly associated with pneumonia (42.1% versus 8.3%, p < 0.01) among intubated patients not receiving antibiotics. When multivariate analysis was repeated in this subpopulation, failure of CASS (RR = 7.52, 95% CI = 1.48 to 38.07) and persistent intracuff pressure below 20 cm H2O (RR = 4.23, 95% CI = 1.12 to 15.92) were factors independently associated with the development of pneumonia. We conclude that leakage of colonized subglottic secretions around the cuff of the endotracheal tube is the most important risk factor for pneumonia within the first 8 d of intubation. This study confirms the importance of maintaining adequate intracuff pressure and effective aspiration of subglottic secretions in preventing pneumonia in intubated patients not receiving antibiotic treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118548387 · Cited by 13,861
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 · Cited by 13,215
Torres, A., Serra-Batlles, J., Ros, E., Piera, C., de la Bellacasa, J. P., Cobos, A., Lomeña, F., & Rodríguez-Roisin, R. (1992) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-116-7-540 · Cited by 721
Cited by
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_225126 · Cited by 406
A low-volume, low-pressure tracheal tube cuff reduces pulmonary aspiration*
Young, P. J., Pakeerathan, S., Blunt, M. C., & Subramanya, S. (2006) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000201406.57821.5b · Cited by 296
RISK FACTORS FOR NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA
Fleming, C. A., Balaguera, H. U., & Craven, D. E. (2001) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70395-3 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Rello, J., Soñora, R., Jubert, P., Artigas, A., Rué, M., & Vallés, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-115
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W1995839475
- Cited by
- 703
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pneumonia in intubated patients: role of respiratory airway care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.154.1.8680665
- The paper
- Rello, J., Soñora, R., Jubert, P., Artigas, A., Rué, M., & Vallés, J. (1996). Pneumonia in intubated patients: role of respiratory airway care. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.154.1.8680665
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.