Cited by 71Respiratory Support and MechanismsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Inspiratory Pressure Support Reduces Slowing of Inspiratory Muscle Relaxation Rate During Exhaustive Treadmill Walking in Severe COPD

Polkey, M I, Kyroussis, D, Mills, G H, Hamnegard, C H, Keilty, S E, Green, M, Moxham, J·1996·American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine

Abstract

When patients with COPD walk to a state of intolerable dyspnea, there is excessive inspiratory muscle loading, as evidenced by slowing of the maximum relaxation rate of the inspiratory muscles, measured from esophageal pressure during a sniff (Sn Pes MRR). In this setting, inspiratory pressure support (IPS) delivered via an orofacial mask increases walking distance and reduces dyspnea, but the mechanism by which this benefit is achieved remains unclear. In this study we compared Sn Pes MRR after equidistant treadmill walking in six men with severe COPD (mean FEV1: 0.6 L, 22% predicted). After the free walk there was a mean slowing of Sn Pes MRR of 41% (p < 0.03). After the IPS-assisted walks, the slowing of Sn Pes MRR was 20% of baseline; this was significantly less than after the free walk (p < 0.05). Four subjects performed shorter walks; after free walks of one third and two thirds of maximum distance, the mean slowing of Sn Pes MRR was 23% and 28%, respectively. We conclude that when patients with COPD walk to exhaustion, IPS reduces slowing of inspiratory muscle MRR, and that this represents a considerable unloading of the inspiratory muscles. The magnitude of the reduction is approximately the same as reducing the distance walked by two thirds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.154.4.8887619

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of ventilatory support on dyspnea are probably mostly related to unloading of the inspiratory muscles during exercise.

    “The effects of these interventions on dyspnea are probably mostly related to unloading of the inspiratory muscles during exercise.155,157–160”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Polkey, M. I., Kyroussis, D., Mills, G. H., Hamnegard, C. H., Keilty, S. E., Green, M., & Moxham, J.
Affiliations
  • Royal Brompton Hospital (GB)
  • Respiratory Muscle Laboratories, Kings College and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Venue
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
Published
1996-10-01
Volume
154
Issue
4
Pages
1146-1150
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2150918253
Cited by
71
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
inspiratory pressure support, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, esophageal pressure, treadmill walking, dyspnea, walking distance
MeSH terms
Aged, Exercise Test, Humans, Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Lung Volume Measurements, Male, Middle Aged, Respiratory Muscles, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise Tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review