Cited by 239Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Depressed Baroreflex Sensitivity in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Carlson, J T, Hedner, J A, Sellgren, J, Elam, M, Wallin, B G·1996·American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine

Abstract

Muscle nerve sympathetic activity (MSA), the interval between two R-waves in the ECG, or the interbeat interval (RR-interval), and blood pressure (BP) were recorded in 10 awake patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and in nine sex- and age-matched controls. Changes in RR-interval and MSA, evoked by sodium nitroprusside-induced reduction of BP, were used to quantitate baroreflex sensitivity. Both the cardiac (expressed as the RR-interval versus mean arterial BP slope) and the muscle sympathetic (mean MSA area versus diastolic BP slope) baroreflex sensitivity were depressed in patients as compared with controls. Cardiac baroreflex slope sensitivity (expressed as a regression coefficient) was 5.5 +/- 1.2 (mean +/- SEM) in patients and 9.6 +/- 0.96 in controls (p < 0.05). The corresponding figures for the sympathetic slope sensitivity were -4.9 +/- 0.9 and -13.1 +/- 2.3, respectively (p < 0.05). Differences remained after stepwise correction for age, body mass index (BMI), and to some extent BP. Resting MSA correlated with cardiac (r = 0.67, p < 0.003) and sympathetic (r = 0.56, p < 0.025) baroreflex sensitivity in the entire study group. We conclude that OSA patients exhibit an impaired baroreflex sensitivity to a hypotensive stimulus, which may represent an adaptive response to changes in BP or hypoxemia occurring in association with nocturnal apneas. Baroreflex adaptation may also contribute to the augmentation of resting MSA observed in OSA patients in this as well as in a previous study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.154.5.8912770

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 239

Authors
Carlson, J. T., Hedner, J. A., Sellgren, J., Elam, M., & Wallin, B. G.
Affiliations
Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
Venue
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
Published
1996-11-01
Volume
154
Issue
5
Pages
1490-1496
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2105719436
Cited by
239
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, baroreflex sensitivity, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, cardiac baroreflex, sympathetic baroreflex, sodium nitroprusside, RR interval, blood pressure, hypoxemia
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Neuromuscular Junction, Nitroprusside, Respiration, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Vasodilator Agents, Baroreflex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review