Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 463

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pathophysiologic basis of acute respiratory distress in patients who fail a trial of weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Jubran, A, Tobin, M J·1997·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

To determine the mechanisms of acute respiratory distress and failure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), we studied 17 ventilator-supported patients who failed a trial of spontaneous breathing and 14 patients who tolerated such a trial and were successfully extubated. Immediately before the weaning trials, maximal inspiratory pressure was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.48). On discontinuation of the ventilator, the failure group immediately developed rapid shallow breathing, and higher values of dynamic lung elastance (EdynL) (p < 0.01) and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi, p < 0.03) than did the success group. Between the onset and end of the trial, the failure group developed further increases in EdynL (p < 0.0001) and PEEPi (p < 0.0001), and increases in inspiratory resistance (p < 0.009) and inspiratory pressure-time product (PTP) (p < 0.0001). Partitioning of PTP at the end of the trial revealed a 111% increase in the PEEPi component, a 33% increase in the non-PEEPi elastic component, and a 42% increase in the resistive component (all p < 0.0001). Despite the increase in PTP, 13 of the failure patients developed an increase in PaCO2. The product of PTP and PaCO2, an index of inefficient CO2 clearance, was more than twice as high in the failure group than in the success group at the end of the trial (p < 0.0005). Thus, development of acute respiratory distress during a failed weaning attempt was due to worsening of pulmonary mechanics, which in conjunction with rapid shallow breathing led to inefficient clearance of CO2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.155.3.9117025

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 463

Metadata

Authors
Jubran, A., & Tobin, M. J.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1997-03
Volume
155
Issue
3
Pages
906-915
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2022009114
Cited by
463
References
1
FWCI
14.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathophysiologic basis of acute respiratory distress in patients who fail a trial of weaning from mechanical ventilation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.155.3.9117025
The paper
Jubran, A., & Tobin, M. J. (1997). Pathophysiologic basis of acute respiratory distress in patients who fail a trial of weaning from mechanical ventilation. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.155.3.9117025

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.