Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 371

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bovine surfactant therapy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Gregory, T J, Steinberg, K P, Spragg, R, Gadek, J E, Hyers, T M, Longmore, W J, Moxley, M A, Cai, G Z, Hite, R D, Smith, R M, Hudson, L D, Crim, C, Newton, P, Mitchell, B R, Gold, A J·1997·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Lung surfactant is deficient in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We performed a randomized, prospective, controlled, open-label clinical study of administration of a bovine surfactant to patients with ARDS to obtain preliminary information about its safety and efficacy. Patients received either surfactant by endotracheal instillation in addition to standard therapy or standard therapy only. Three different groups of patients receiving surfactant were studied: patients receiving up to eight doses of 50 mg phospholipids/kg, those receiving up to eight doses of 100 mg phospholipids/kg, and those receiving up to four doses of 100 mg phospholipids/kg. Outcome measures included ventilatory support parameters, arterial blood gases, organ system failures, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) analyses, immunologic analyses, survival, and adverse events during the 28-d study period. Fifty-nine study patients were evaluable; 43 in the surfactant group and 16 in the control group. The FI(O2) at 120 h after treatment began was significantly decreased only for patients who received up to four doses of 100 mg phospholipids/kg surfactant as compared with control patients (p = 0.011). Mortality in the same group of patients was 18.8%, as compared with 43.8% in the control group (p = 0.075). The surfactant instillation was generally well tolerated, and no safety concerns were identified. This pilot study presents preliminary evidence that surfactant might have therapeutic benefit for patients with ARDS, and provides rationale for further clinical study of this agent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.155.4.9105072

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 371

Metadata

Authors
Gregory, T. J., Steinberg, K. P., Spragg, R., Gadek, J. E., Hyers, T. M., Longmore, W. J., Moxley, M. A., Cai, G. Z., Hite, R. D., Smith, R. M., Hudson, L. D., Crim, C., Newton, P., Mitchell, B. R., & Gold, A. J.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1997-04
Volume
155
Issue
4
Pages
1309-1315
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1971305507
Cited by
371
References
1
FWCI
30.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bovine surfactant therapy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.155.4.9105072
The paper
Gregory, T. J., Steinberg, K. P., Spragg, R., Gadek, J. E., Hyers, T. M., Longmore, W. J., Moxley, M. A., Cai, G. Z., Hite, R. D., Smith, R. M., Hudson, L. D., Crim, C., Newton, P., Mitchell, B. R., & Gold, A. J. (1997). Bovine surfactant therapy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.155.4.9105072

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.