Cited by 1,039Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisOccupational and environmental lung diseasesTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes

Prognostic Significance of Histopathologic Subsets in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

BJORAKER, JULIE A., RYU, JAY H., EDWIN, MARK K., MYERS, JEFFREY L., TAZELAAR, HENRY D., SCHROEDER, DARRELL R., OFFORD, KENNETH P.·1998·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a generally fatal disorder with a reported median survival of 3 to 6 yr. This has been based on relatively few studies with diagnoses inconsistently confirmed by adequate lung biopsy. Retrospective analysis of 104 patients with IPF who had open lung biopsy (OLB) at Mayo Medical Center from 1976 to 1985 was performed to establish the overall survival rate, the spectrum of histopathological subgroups and their associated prognostic significance. The study group consisted of 54 men and 50 women with a median age of 63 yr. Median survival was 3.8 yr after diagnosis by OLB with an estimated 10 yr survival of 27%. Current histopathologic review showed a heterogeneous group including usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP), nonspecific interstitial pneumonia/fibrosis (NSIP), acute interstitial pneumonia (AIP), bronchiolitis, bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP), and others. Median survival of the UIP group was 2.8 yr which is significantly worse (p < 0.001) than for other subgroups of chronic interstitial pneumonias. IPF includes several histopathologic subgroups with significantly different survival rates. Patients with UIP have worse survival than patients with other types of idiopathic chronic interstitial pneumonias including NSIP. Accurate histopathologic classification is essential for prognostication in patients with IPF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.157.1.9704130

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BJORAKER, J. A., RYU, J. H., EDWIN, M. K., MYERS, J. L., TAZELAAR, H. D., SCHROEDER, D. R., & OFFORD, K. P.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1998-01-01
Volume
157
Issue
1
Pages
199-203
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2140923971
Cited by
1,039
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 44
FWCI
34.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Occupational and environmental lung diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Keywords
idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, prognostic value, survival, usual interstitial pneumonia, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, acute interstitial pneumonia, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, chronic interstitial pneumonia, histological classification, open lung biopsy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Biopsy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prednisone, Prognosis, Pulmonary Fibrosis, Retrospective Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review