Cited by 634Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

A Controlled Trial of Sildenafil in Advanced Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Open access
The Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Research Network·2010·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, may preferentially improve blood flow to well-ventilated regions of the lung in patients with advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, which could result in improvements in gas exchange. We tested the hypothesis that treatment with sildenafil would improve walk distance, dyspnea, and quality of life in patients with advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, defined as a carbon monoxide diffusion capacity of less than 35% of the predicted value. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of sildenafil in two periods. The first period consisted of 12 weeks of a double-blind comparison between sildenafil and a placebo control. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an increase in the 6-minute walk distance of 20% or more. Key secondary outcomes included changes in oxygenation, degree of dyspnea, and quality of life. The second period was a 12-week open-label evaluation involving all patients receiving sildenafil. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients were enrolled in the study. The difference in the primary outcome was not significant, with 9 of 89 patients (10%) in the sildenafil group and 6 of 91 (7%) in the placebo group having an improvement of 20% or more in the 6-minute walk distance (P=0.39). There were small but significant differences in arterial oxygenation, carbon monoxide diffusion capacity, degree of dyspnea, and quality of life favoring the sildenafil group. Serious adverse events were similar in the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show a benefit for sildenafil for the primary outcome. The presence of some positive secondary outcomes creates clinical equipoise for further research. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00517933.)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1002110

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bosentan, macitentan, ambrisentan, and sildenafil all failed to improve physiological or symptomatic measures compared with placebo in IPF.

    “Bosentan [64,65], macitentan [66], ambrisentan [67] and sildenafil [63,68] all failed to demonstrate improved physiological or symptomatic measures compared to placebo.”

    From Emerging pharmacological options in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (2024) · cites this paper as [64]

    For sildenafil, the Results and Discussion report no significant benefit on the primary 6-minute-walk outcome, but they report significant improvements versus placebo in physiological measures, dyspnea, and quality of life. Thus the claim that sildenafil failed to improve physiological or symptomatic measures contradicts this paper. This citation is attached to sildenafil, not the other three drugs. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Research Network
Corresponding author
The Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Research Network
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2010-08-12
Volume
363
Issue
7
Pages
620-628
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2108280422
Cited by
634
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 39
FWCI
36.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U10HL80413, U10HL080509, U10HL080543, U10HL80383, U10HL80509, U10HL080571, U10HL80274, U10HL80371, U10HL080383, U10HL080513, U10HL80513, U10HL080685, U10HL80411, U10HL080510, U10HL080413, U10HL80370, U10HL080370, U10HL080411, U10HL80571, U10HL80685, R01HL067967, U10HL80543, U10HL80510, U10HL080274, U10HL080371)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
sildenafil, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, 6-minute walk distance, dyspnea, quality of life, arterial oxygenation, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, pulmonary blood flow, gas exchange
MeSH terms
Sildenafil Citrate, Administration, Oral, Aged, Double-Blind Method, Dyspnea, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Piperazines, Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity, Purines, Quality of Life, Respiratory Function Tests, Sulfones, Vasodilator Agents, Treatment Outcome, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review