Cited by 220Neonatal Respiratory Health ResearchPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Respiratory function among preterm infants whose mothers smoked during pregnancy

HOO, AH-FONG, HENSCHEN, MATTHIAS, DEZATEUX, CAROL, COSTELOE, KATE, STOCKS, JANET·1998·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

We examined whether the adverse effects of prenatal exposure to tobacco on lung development are limited to the last weeks of gestation by comparing respiratory function in preterm infants whose mothers had and had not smoked during pregnancy. Maximal forced expiratory flow (Vmax FRC) and time to peak tidal expiratory flow as a proportion of total expiratory time (TPTEF:TE) were measured prior to discharge from hospital in 108 preterm infants (mean [SD] gestational age, 33.5 [1.8] wk), 40 of whose mothers had smoked during pregnancy. Infant urinary cotinine was less than 4 ng/ml in those born to nonsmokers, but it was as high as 458 ng/ml in exposed infants (p < 0.0001). TPTEF:TE was significantly lower in infants exposed to tobacco in utero (mean [SD], 0.369 [0.109]) when compared with those who were not (0.426 [0.135]) (p <= 0.02). Vmax FRC was also reduced in exposed infants (mean [SD], 85.2 [41.7] ml/s versus 103.8 [49.7] ml/s) (p = 0.07). After allowing for sex, ethnic group, body size, postnatal age, and socioeconomic status, TPTEF:TE remained significantly diminished in infants exposed prenatally to tobacco (p < 0.05). Thus, impaired respiratory function is evident in infants born on average 7 wk prior to the expected delivery date, suggesting that the adverse effects of prenatal exposure to tobacco are not limited to the last weeks of pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.158.3.9711057

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 220

Authors
HOO, A.-F., HENSCHEN, M., DEZATEUX, C., COSTELOE, K., & STOCKS, J.
Affiliations
Homerton University Hospital (GB)
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1998-09-01
Volume
158
Issue
3
Pages
700-705
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2126081460
Cited by
220
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
prenatal tobacco exposure, smoking during pregnancy, preterm infants, lung development, respiratory function, urinary cotinine, gestational age, neonatal lung function
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Body Constitution, Cotinine, Ethnicity, Female, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Functional Residual Capacity, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Lung, Male, Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Respiration, Sex Factors, Smoking, Social Class, Tidal Volume, Time Factors, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review