The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A National Survey of End-of-life Care for Critically Ill Patients
Abstract
In some intensive care units (ICUs), fewer patients who die now undergo attempts at cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and many more have life support actively withdrawn prior to death than did a decade ago. To determine the frequency of withdrawal of life support, we contacted every American postgraduate training program with significant clinical exposure to critical care medicine, asking them prospectively to classify patients who died into one of five mutually exclusive categories. We received data from 131 ICUs at 110 institutions in 38 states. There were 6,303 deaths, of which 393 patients were brain dead. Of the remaining 5,910 patients who died, 1,544 (23%) received full ICU care including failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); 1,430 (22%) received full ICU care without CPR; 797 (10%) had life support withheld; and 2,139 (38%) had life support withdrawn. There was wide variation in practice among ICUs, with ranges of 4 to 79%, 0 to 83%, 0 to 67%, and 0 to 79% in these four categories, respectively. Variation was not related to ICU type, hospital type, number of admissions, or ICU mortality. We conclude that limitation of life support prior to death is the predominant practice in American ICUs associated with critical care training programs. There is wide variation in end-of-life care, and efforts are needed to understand practice patterns and to establish standards of care for patients dying in ICUs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zimmerman, J. E., Kramer, A. A., McNair, D. S., & Malila, F. M. (2006) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000215112.84523.f0 · Cited by 1,764
Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: An epidemiologic study*
Angus, D. C., Barnato, A. E., Linde-Zwirble, W. T., Weissfeld, L. A., Watson, R. S., Rickert, T., & Rubenfeld, G. D. (2004) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000114816.62331.08 · Cited by 1,155
Systematic Review: The Effect on Surrogates of Making Treatment Decisions for Others
Wendler, D., & Rid, A. (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-00008 · Cited by 691
End-of-life decision-making in six European countries: descriptive study
van der Heide, A., Deliens, L., Faisst, K., Nilstun, T., Norup, M., Paci, E., van der Wal, G., & van der Maas, P. J. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14019-6 · Cited by 664
Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive-care units in France: a prospective survey
Ferrand, E., Robert, R., Ingrand, P., & Lemaire, F. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03564-9 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- PRENDERGAST, T. J., CLAESSENS, M. T., & LUCE, J. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-10-01
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1163-1167
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2148270065
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A National Survey of End-of-life Care for Critically Ill Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.158.4.9801108
- The paper
- PRENDERGAST, T. J., CLAESSENS, M. T., & LUCE, J. M. (1998). A National Survey of End-of-life Care for Critically Ill Patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.158.4.9801108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.