The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Norepinephrine on the Renal Vasculature in Normal and Endotoxemic Dogs
Abstract
Septic shock is often complicated by systemic hypotension despite normal or increased cardiac output. Restoration of arterial pressure usually requires the administration of systemic vasopressor agents, such as norepinephrine. However, because norepinephrine induces vasoconstriction in other vascular beds, it may decrease visceral blood flow, impairing visceral organ function. Because sepsis is often associated with impaired peripheral vascular responsiveness, we hypothesized that, unlike in normal circulatory conditions, norepinephrine would improve visceral organ blood flow in sepsis by selectively increasing organ perfusion pressure. Thus, in nine pentobarbital-anesthetized, mechanically ventilated dogs, we measured the effect of norepinephrine infusion (0.3 microgram/kg/min) on renal, hepatic, and portal steady-state pressure-flow relations (P/Q) and the dynamic vascular P/Q, created by transient inferior vena caval occlusion, under basal and endotoxic conditions. Norepinephrine increased organ perfusion pressures during both control and endotoxemic conditions. However, even after controlling for the pressure effect using a general linear model, NE was associated with an increase in renal blood flow both before and after endotoxin administration. We conclude that, unlike the effects of administering norepinephrine under baseline conditions, norepinephrine infusion during endotoxic shock actually increases renal blood flow and that this effect is not the result of an increase in perfusion pressure alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Calzavacca, P., Licari, E., & Bellomo, R. (2010) · Surgical Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77893-8_38 · Cited by 533
Self-citationDubin, A., Pozo, M. O., Casabella, C. A., Pálizas, F., Murias, G., Moseinco, M. C., Kanoore Edul, V. S., Pálizas, F., Estenssoro, E., & Ince, C. (2009) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc7922 · Cited by 466
Blot, S. I., Pea, F., & Lipman, J. (2014) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.07.006 · Cited by 444
Augmented Renal Clearance: Implications for Antibacterial Dosing in the Critically Ill
Udy, A. A., Roberts, J. A., Boots, R. J., Paterson, D. L., & Lipman, J. (2010) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/11318140-000000000-00000 · Cited by 377
for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group., Lamontagne, F., Meade, M. O., Hébert, P. C., Asfar, P., Lauzier, F., Seely, A. J. E., Day, A. G., Mehta, S., Muscedere, J., et al. (2016) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4237-3 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- BELLOMO, R., KELLUM, J. A., WISNIEWSKI, S. R., PINSKY, M. R., & Ondulik, B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1186-1192
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2106763736
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Norepinephrine on the Renal Vasculature in Normal and Endotoxemic Dogs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.159.4.9802055
- The paper
- BELLOMO, R., KELLUM, J. A., WISNIEWSKI, S. R., PINSKY, M. R., & Ondulik, B. (1999). Effects of Norepinephrine on the Renal Vasculature in Normal and Endotoxemic Dogs. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.159.4.9802055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.