The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variations in Etiology of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia across Four Treatment Sites: Implications for Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices
Abstract
This retrospective multicenter study compared microorganisms documented by quantitative cultures from bronchoscopic samples in episodes of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) from three different institutions in Barcelona (B), Montevideo (M), and Seville (S). The observations were compared with the findings reported by Trouillet and coworkers (AJRCCM 1998;157:531-539) in Paris (P). The objective was to evaluate whether a classification of etiologies of VAP in four groups, based on the number of ventilation days and previous antimicrobial use, might contribute to establishing generalized guidelines for empirical therapy. Significant variations in etiologies (p < 0.05) were found in all of the microorganisms isolated from VAP episodes across three treatment sites when compared with the reference site (P). In Group 1 (< 7 d and absence of antibiotics), Pseudomonas aeruginosa remained extremely infrequent (3 of 89, 3.3%) in the joint category, whereas the incidence of Acinetobacter baumannii was significantly higher, owing to M findings. On the other hand, one site (B) had a significantly lower incidence of multiresistant pathogens (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA] and nonfermenters other than P. aeruginosa), even in Group 2 (< 7 d and antibiotics), Group 3 (>/= 7 d and absence of antibiotics), and Group 4 (antibiotics and >/= 7 days). Similar findings were documented when episodes were grouped according to Groups 1 and 3 of the ATS guidelines. We conclude that causes of VAP varied markedly across four treatment sites, resulting in the need for large-scale variations in antimicrobial prescribing practices. Instead of following general recommendations, antimicrobial prescribing practices for VAP should be based on up-to-date information of the pattern of multiresistant isolates from each institution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kalil, A. C., Metersky, M. L., Klompas, M., Muscedere, J., Sweeney, D. A., Palmer, L. B., Napolitano, L. M., O'Grady, N. P., Bartlett, J. G., Carratalà, J., et al. (2016) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciw353 · Cited by 3,892
Ibrahim, E. H., Sherman, G., Ward, S., Fraser, V. J., & Kollef, M. H. (2000) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.118.1.146 · Cited by 1,779
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_225126 · Cited by 406
Agbaht, K., Diaz, E., Muñoz, E., Lisboa, T., Gomez, F., Depuydt, P. O., Blot, S. I., & Rello, J. (2007) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000277042.31524.66 · Cited by 109
Self-citationMagret, M., Lisboa, T., Martin-Loeches, I., Máñez, R., Nauwynck, M., Wrigge, H., Cardellino, S., Díaz, E., Koulenti, D., Rello, J., et al. (2011) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc10036 · Cited by 105
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- RELLO, J., SA-BORGES, M., CORREA, H., LEAL, S.-R., & BARAIBAR, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-08-01
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 608-613
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W1852503640
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variations in Etiology of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia across Four Treatment Sites: Implications for Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.160.2.9812034
- The paper
- RELLO, J., SA-BORGES, M., CORREA, H., LEAL, S.-R., & BARAIBAR, J. (1999). Variations in Etiology of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia across Four Treatment Sites: Implications for Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.160.2.9812034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.