Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 352

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Variations in Etiology of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia across Four Treatment Sites: Implications for Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices

RELLO, JORDI, SA-BORGES, MARCIO, CORREA, HUMBERTO, LEAL, SANTIAGO-RAMON, BARAIBAR, JORGE·1999·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

This retrospective multicenter study compared microorganisms documented by quantitative cultures from bronchoscopic samples in episodes of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) from three different institutions in Barcelona (B), Montevideo (M), and Seville (S). The observations were compared with the findings reported by Trouillet and coworkers (AJRCCM 1998;157:531-539) in Paris (P). The objective was to evaluate whether a classification of etiologies of VAP in four groups, based on the number of ventilation days and previous antimicrobial use, might contribute to establishing generalized guidelines for empirical therapy. Significant variations in etiologies (p < 0.05) were found in all of the microorganisms isolated from VAP episodes across three treatment sites when compared with the reference site (P). In Group 1 (< 7 d and absence of antibiotics), Pseudomonas aeruginosa remained extremely infrequent (3 of 89, 3.3%) in the joint category, whereas the incidence of Acinetobacter baumannii was significantly higher, owing to M findings. On the other hand, one site (B) had a significantly lower incidence of multiresistant pathogens (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA] and nonfermenters other than P. aeruginosa), even in Group 2 (< 7 d and antibiotics), Group 3 (>/= 7 d and absence of antibiotics), and Group 4 (antibiotics and >/= 7 days). Similar findings were documented when episodes were grouped according to Groups 1 and 3 of the ATS guidelines. We conclude that causes of VAP varied markedly across four treatment sites, resulting in the need for large-scale variations in antimicrobial prescribing practices. Instead of following general recommendations, antimicrobial prescribing practices for VAP should be based on up-to-date information of the pattern of multiresistant isolates from each institution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.160.2.9812034

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 352

Metadata

Authors
RELLO, J., SA-BORGES, M., CORREA, H., LEAL, S.-R., & BARAIBAR, J.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1999-08-01
Volume
160
Issue
2
Pages
608-613
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1852503640
Cited by
352
References
0
FWCI
13.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variations in Etiology of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia across Four Treatment Sites: Implications for Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.160.2.9812034
The paper
RELLO, J., SA-BORGES, M., CORREA, H., LEAL, S.-R., & BARAIBAR, J. (1999). Variations in Etiology of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia across Four Treatment Sites: Implications for Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.160.2.9812034

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.