Cited by 695Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchSmoking Behavior and CessationAsthma and respiratory diseases

Computed Tomographic Measurements of Airway Dimensions and Emphysema in Smokers

NAKANO, YASUTAKA, MURO, SHIGEO, SAKAI, HIROAKI, HIRAI, TOYOHIRO, CHIN, KAZUO, TSUKINO, MITSUHIRO, NISHIMURA, KOICHI, ITOH, HARUMI +3 more·2000·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by the presence of airflow obstruction caused by emphysema or airway narrowing, or both. Low attenuation areas (LAA) on computed tomography (CT) have been shown to represent macroscopic or microscopic emphysema, or both. However CT has not been used to quantify the airway abnormalities in smokers with or without airflow obstruction. In this study, we used CT to evaluate both emphysema and airway wall thickening in 114 smokers. The CT measurements revealed that a decreased FEV1 (%predicted) is associated with an increase of airway wall area and an increase of emphysema. Although both airway wall thickening and emphysema (LAA) correlated with measurements of lung function, stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the combination of airway and emphysema measurements improved the estimate of pulmonary function test abnormalities. We conclude that both CT measurements of airway dimensions and emphysema are useful and complementary in the evaluation of the lung of smokers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.162.3.9907120

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Radiographic techniques are not commonly used clinically to measure static hyperinflation in COPD because of a lack of standardization.

    “Finally, because of a lack of standardization, radiographic techniques144–147 are not commonly used clinically to measure static hyperinflation in COPD.32”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NAKANO, Y., MURO, S., SAKAI, H., HIRAI, T., CHIN, K., TSUKINO, M., NISHIMURA, K., ITOH, H., PARÉ, P. D., HOGG, J. C., & MISHIMA, M.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2000-09-01
Volume
162
Issue
3
Pages
1102-1108
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2171647346
Cited by
695
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 53
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, airway wall thickening, airway dimensions, smokers, low attenuation area, FEV1, lung function, airflow obstruction, computed tomography
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Airway Resistance, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Pulmonary Emphysema, Smoking, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review