Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Exacerbations of Bronchitis: Bronchial Eosinophilia and Gene Expression for Interleukin-4, Interleukin-5, and Eosinophil Chemoattractants

Open access
ZHU, JIE, QIU, YU SHENG, MAJUMDAR, SWATI, GAMBLE, ELIZABETH, MATIN, DEAN, TURATO, GRAZIELLA, FABBRI, LEONARDO M., BARNES, NEIL, SAETTA, MARINA, JEFFERY, PETER K.·2001·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Eosinophilia has been reported during exacerbations of bronchitis, but the mechanisms of tissue recruitment of eosinophils are unclear. We quantified eosinophils and the concurrent expression of cytokines and chemokines probably responsible for the tissue eosinophilia in bronchial biopsies obtained from three groups of nonatopic subjects: (1) healthy nonsmokers (n = 7; FEV1 % predicted = 108 +/- 4 [mean +/- SEM]); (2) nonasthmatic smokers with chronic bronchitis (CB) in a stable phase of their disease (n = 11; FEV1 % predicted: 75 +/- 5); and (3) nonasthmatic subjects with CB who sought medical advice for an exacerbation of their condition (n = 9; FEV(1) % predicted: 61 +/- 8). We applied anti-EG2 antibody and immunostaining to detect and count eosinophils. We performed in situ hybridization to visualize and enumerate cells expressing the genes for interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5 and the eosinophil chemokines eotaxin, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-4, or regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES). We confirmed an increase in EG2-positive eosinophils in patients with CB in exacerbation. We found messenger RNA (mRNA) positivity for IL-4 and IL-5 in CB, but the between-group differences were not statistically significant. However, the numbers of lymphomononuclear cells expressing eotaxin mRNA were significantly greater in the smokers with CB than in the healthy nonsmokers without CB (p < 0.01). Following an exacerbation, RANTES expression was upregulated and this chemokine was strongly expressed in both the surface epithelium and in subepithelial lymphomononuclear cells: only RANTES showed a significant positive correlation with the increasing number of EG2-positive cells (r = 0.51; p < 0.03). In conclusion, an allergic profile of inflammation can also occur in CB: the marked upregulation of RANTES in the epithelium and subepithelium most likely accounts for the increased eosinophilia associated with an exacerbation of bronchitis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.164.1.2007050

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 203

Metadata

Authors
ZHU, J., QIU, Y. S., MAJUMDAR, S., GAMBLE, E., MATIN, D., TURATO, G., FABBRI, L. M., BARNES, N., SAETTA, M., & JEFFERY, P. K.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2001-07-01
Volume
164
Issue
1
Pages
109-116
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1933597658
Cited by
203
References
0
FWCI
6.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exacerbations of Bronchitis: Bronchial Eosinophilia and Gene Expression for Interleukin-4, Interleukin-5, and Eosinophil Chemoattractants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.164.1.2007050
The paper
ZHU, J., QIU, Y. S., MAJUMDAR, S., GAMBLE, E., MATIN, D., TURATO, G., FABBRI, L. M., BARNES, N., SAETTA, M., & JEFFERY, P. K. (2001). Exacerbations of Bronchitis: Bronchial Eosinophilia and Gene Expression for Interleukin-4, Interleukin-5, and Eosinophil Chemoattractants. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.1.2007050

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.