Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 552

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Utility of a Lung Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

HUNNINGHAKE, GARY W., ZIMMERMAN, M. BRIDGET, SCHWARTZ, DAVID A., KING, TALMADGE E., LYNCH, JOSEPH, HEGELE, RICHARD, WALDRON, JAMES, COLBY, THOMAS, MÜLLER, NESTOR, LYNCH, DAVID, GALVIN, JEFF, GROSS, BARRY, HOGG, JAMES, TOEWS, GALEN, HELMERS, RICK, COOPER, J. ALLEN D., BAUGHMAN, ROBERT, STRANGE, CHARLIE, MILLARD, MARK·2001·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

It is not known if a surgical lung biopsy is necessary in all patients for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We conducted a blinded, prospective study at eight referring centers. Initially, cases were evaluated by clinical history and examination, transbronchial biopsy, and high-resolution lung computed tomography scans. Pulmonologists at the referring centers then assessed their certainty of the diagnosis of IPF and provided an overall diagnosis, before surgical lung biopsy. The lung biopsies were reviewed by a pathology core and 54 of 91 patients received a pathologic diagnosis of IPF. The positive predictive value of a confident (certain) clinical diagnosis of IPF by the referring centers was 80%. The positive predictive value of a confident clinical diagnosis was higher, when the cases were reviewed by a core of pulmonologists (87%) or radiologists (96%). Lung biopsy was most important for diagnosis in those patients with an uncertain diagnosis and those thought unlikely to have IPF. These studies suggest that clinical and radiologic data that result in a confident diagnosis of IPF by an experienced pulmonologist or radiologist are sufficient to obviate the need for a lung biopsy. Lung biopsy is most helpful when clinical and radiologic data result in an uncertain diagnosis or when patients are thought not to have IPF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.164.2.2101090

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 552

Metadata

Authors
HUNNINGHAKE, G. W., ZIMMERMAN, M. B., SCHWARTZ, D. A., KING, T. E., LYNCH, J., HEGELE, R., WALDRON, J., COLBY, T., MÜLLER, N., LYNCH, D., GALVIN, J., GROSS, B., HOGG, J., TOEWS, G., HELMERS, R., COOPER, J. A. D., BAUGHMAN, R., STRANGE, C., & MILLARD, M.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2001-07-15
Volume
164
Issue
2
Pages
193-196
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2141785470
Cited by
552
References
1
FWCI
18.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utility of a Lung Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.164.2.2101090
The paper
HUNNINGHAKE, G. W., ZIMMERMAN, M. B., SCHWARTZ, D. A., KING, T. E., LYNCH, J., HEGELE, R., WALDRON, J., COLBY, T., MÜLLER, N., LYNCH, D., GALVIN, J., GROSS, B., HOGG, J., TOEWS, G., HELMERS, R., COOPER, J. A. D., BAUGHMAN, R., STRANGE, C., & MILLARD, M. (2001). Utility of a Lung Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.2.2101090

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.