Cited by 1,310Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisOccupational and environmental lung diseasesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Incidence and Prevalence of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Raghu, Ganesh, Weycker, Derek, Edelsberg, John, Bradford, Williamson Z., Oster, Gerry·2006·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Rationale: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a chronic interstitial lung disease of unknown etiology; its epidemiology in the United States has not been well characterized. Objective: To estimate the annual incidence and prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the United States. Methods: Retrospective cohort design utilizing a large health care claims database spanning the period January 1996 through December 2000. Measurements and Main Results: Persons with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were identified based on diagnosis and procedure codes. Using broad case-finding criteria, prevalence was estimated to range from 4.0 per 100,000 persons aged 18 to 34 yr to 227.2 per 100,000 among those 75 yr or older; annual incidence was estimated to range from 1.2 to 76.4 per 100,000. Using narrow case-finding criteria, prevalence ranged from 0.8 to 64.7 per 100,000 persons; comparable figures for incidence were 0.4 to 27.1 per 100,000 persons. Extrapolating these rates to the overall United States' population, prevalence was estimated to be 42.7 per 100,000 (incidence, 16.3 per 100,000) using broad criteria; with narrow criteria, prevalence was estimated to be 14.0 per 100,000 (incidence, 6.8 per 100,000). Conclusions: Our results suggest that idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is probably more common in the United States than previously reported.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200602-163oc

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using a prevalence of 14-43 per 100,000 and a US adult population of approximately 311 million in 2011, less than 1% of the estimated 42,000-130,000 US IPF patients had received a lung transplant during 2011.

    “Using a prevalence of 14–43 per 100,000 [73] and a US adult population of approximately 311 million in 2011 [74], less than 1% of the estimated 42,000–130,000 US IPF patients had received a lung transplant during 2011.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raghu, G., Weycker, D., Edelsberg, J., Bradford, W. Z., & Oster, G.
Affiliations
University of Washington Medical Center (US)
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2006-10-01
Volume
174
Issue
7
Pages
810-816
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2134215992
Cited by
1,310
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 68
FWCI
24.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Occupational and environmental lung diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, incidence, prevalence, interstitial lung disease, health insurance claims, age distribution
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Fibrosis, Retrospective Studies, United States, Incidence, Prevalence, International Classification of Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review