The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Occupational Exposures and Chronic Respiratory Symptoms: A Population-Based Study
Abstract
Data from a random sample of 8,515 white adults residing in 6 cities in the eastern and midwestern United States were used to examine the relationships between occupational exposures to dust or to gases and fumes and chronic respiratory symptoms; 31% of the population had a history of occupational dust exposure and 30% reported exposure to gas or fumes. After adjusting for smoking habits, age, gender, and city of residence, subjects with either occupational exposure had significantly elevated prevalences of chronic cough, chronic phlegm, persistent wheeze, and breathlessness. The adjusted relative odds of chronic respiratory symptoms for subjects exposed to dust ranged from 1.32 to 1.60. Subjects with gas or fume exposure had relative odds of symptoms between 1.27 and 1.43 when compared with unexposed subjects. Occupational dust exposure was associated with a higher prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as defined by an FEV1/FVC ratio of less than 0.6, when comparing exposed and unexposed participants (OR = 1.53, 95% Cl = 1.17-2.08). Gas or fume exposure was associated with a small, but not significant, increase in COPD prevalence. Significant trends were noted for wheeze and phlegm with increasing duration of dust exposure. Although 36% of exposed subjects reported exposure to both dust and fumes, there was no evidence of a multiplicative interaction between the effects of the individual exposures. Smoking was a significant independent predictor of symptoms, but did not appear to modify the effect of dust or fumes on symptom reporting. These data, obtained in random samples of general populations, demonstrate that chronic respiratory symptoms and disease can be independently associated with occupational exposures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
American thoracic society statement: occupational contribution to the burden of airway disease
(2003) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.167.5.787 · Cited by 874
Occupational Injury and Illness in the United States: Estimates of Costs, Morbidity, and Mortality
Leigh, J. P. (1997) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1997.00440350063006 · Cited by 508
Cough and Bronchial Responsiveness in Firefighters at the World Trade Center Site
Prezant, D. J., Weiden, M., Banauch, G. I., McGuinness, G., Rom, W. N., Aldrich, T. K., & Kelly, K. J. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021300 · Cited by 411
The occupational burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Trupin, L., Earnest, G., San Pedro, M., Balmes, J. R., Eisner, M. D., Yelin, E., Katz, P. P., & Blanc, P. D. (2003) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.03.00094203 · Cited by 347
Hnizdo, E. (2002) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwf105 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Korn, R. J., Dockery, D. W., Speizer, F. E., Ware, J. H., & Ferris, B. G.
- Venue
- American Review of Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-08
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 298-304
- ISSN
- 0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127987177
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Occupational Exposures and Chronic Respiratory Symptoms: A Population-Based Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/136.2.298
- The paper
- Korn, R. J., Dockery, D. W., Speizer, F. E., Ware, J. H., & Ferris, B. G. (1987). Occupational Exposures and Chronic Respiratory Symptoms: A Population-Based Study. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/136.2.298
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.