The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Autoradiographic Visualization of Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes in Human and Guinea Pig Lung
Abstract
Muscarinic receptor subtypes have been localized in human and guinea pig lung sections by an autoradiographic technique, using [3H](-)quinuclidinyl benzilate [( 3H]QNB) and selective muscarinic antagonists. [3H]QNB was incubated with tissue sections for 90 min at 25 degrees C, and nonspecific binding was determined by incubating adjacent serial sections in the presence of 1 microM atropine. Binding to lung sections had the characterization expected for muscarinic receptors. Autoradiography revealed that muscarinic receptors were widely distributed in human lung, with dense labeling over submucosal glands and airway ganglia, and moderate labeling over nerves in intrapulmonary bronchi and of airway smooth muscle of large and small airways. In addition, alveolar walls were uniformly labeled. In guinea pig lung, labeling of airway smooth muscle was similar, but in contrast to human airways, epithelium was labeled but alveolar walls were not. The muscarinic receptors of human airway smooth muscle from large to small airways were entirely of the M3-subtype, whereas in guinea pig airway smooth muscle, the majority were the M3-subtype with a very small population of the M2-subtype present. In human bronchial submucosal glands, M1- and M3-subtypes appeared to coexist in the proportions of 36 and 64%, respectively. In human alveolar walls the muscarinic receptors were entirely of the M1-subtype, which is absent from the guinea pig lung. No M2-receptors were demonstrated in human lung. The localization of M1-receptors was confirmed by direct labeling with [3H]pirenzepine. With the exception of the alveolar walls in human lung, the localization of muscarinic receptor subtypes on structures in the lung is consistent with known functional studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Labiris, N. R., & Dolovich, M. B. (2003) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01892.x · Cited by 1,245
Muscarinic receptor signaling in the pathophysiology of asthma and COPD
Gosens, R., Zaagsma, J., Meurs, H., & Halayko, A. J. (2006) · Respiratory Research · doi:10.1186/1465-9921-7-73 · Cited by 409
Muscarinic receptor subtypes in airways
Barnes, P. J. (1993) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/0024-3205(93)90310-y · Cited by 255
Self-citationChoosing inhaler devices for people with asthma: Current knowledge and outstanding research needs
Haughney, J., Price, D., Barnes, N. C., Virchow, J. C., Roche, N., & Chrystyn, H. (2010) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2010.04.012 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Mak, J. C. W., & Barnes, P. J.
- Venue
- American Review of Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1559-1568
- ISSN
- 0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102705244
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autoradiographic Visualization of Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes in Human and Guinea Pig Lung. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/141.6.1559
- The paper
- Mak, J. C. W., & Barnes, P. J. (1990). Autoradiographic Visualization of Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes in Human and Guinea Pig Lung. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/141.6.1559
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.