The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cellular and Biochemical Analysis of Induced Sputum from Asthmatic and from Healthy Subjects
Abstract
To determine the feasibility of cellular and biochemical analysis of sputum induced after inhalation of hypertonic (3%) saline, we analyzed sputum induced in 10 healthy and in 18 asthmatic subjects. We also analyzed saliva samples from all subjects. The entire sputum sample and the saliva sample were reduced using dithiothreitol, and cell counts and differentials were determined. Biochemical analysis was performed on sputum and saliva supernatants obtained after centrifugation. We found that induced sputum from asthmatic subjects had a higher percentage of eosinophils [8.1 +/- 3.43 (mean +/- SEM) versus 0.03 +/- 0.02%, p < 0.009] (after excluding squamous cells) and also had higher levels of albumin (232.3 +/- 54.8 versus 79.5 +/- 9.7 micrograms/ml, p < 0.02), fibrinogen (44.2 +/- 11.6 versus 11.9 +/- 2.5 micrograms/ml, p < 0.008) and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) (142.6 +/- 34.2 versus 26.1 +/- 4.7 ng/ml, p < 0.006) but not of histamine or tryptase. In saliva, squamous cells made up more than 99% of the cells in both groups, and protein concentrations were not significantly different. We conclude that cellular and biochemical analysis of induced sputum is feasible in healthy and in asthmatic subjects and that it reveals differences similar to those reported from analyses of bronchial lavage fluid.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Asthma: From Bronchoconstriction to Airways Inflammation and Remodeling
BOUSQUET, J., JEFFERY, P. K., BUSSE, W. W., JOHNSON, M., & VIGNOLA, A. M. (2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9903102 · Cited by 1,702
Prominent neutrophilic inflammation in sputum from subjects with asthma exacerbation
Fahya, B., Kimb, K. W., Liub, J., & Bousheya, B. (1995) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0091-6749(95)70128-1 · Cited by 678
Disruption of Nrf2 enhances susceptibility to severe airway inflammation and asthma in mice
Rangasamy, T., Guo, J., Mitzner, W. A., Roman, J., Singh, A., Fryer, A. D., Yamamoto, M., Kensler, T. W., Tuder, R. M., Georas, S. N., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20050538 · Cited by 580
The use of induced sputum to investigate airway inflammation
Pavord, I. D., Pizzichini, M. M., Pizzichini, E., & Hargreave, F. E. (1997) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.52.6.498 · Cited by 420
Induced Sputum Cell Counts in Healthy Adults
BELDA, J., LEIGH, R., PARAMESWARAN, K., O'BYRNE, P. M., SEARS, M. R., & HARGREAVE, F. E. (2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.2.9903097 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Fahy, J. V., Liu, J., Wong, H., & Boushey, H. A.
- Venue
- American Review of Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-05
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1126-1131
- ISSN
- 0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995024650
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular and Biochemical Analysis of Induced Sputum from Asthmatic and from Healthy Subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/147.5.1126
- The paper
- Fahy, J. V., Liu, J., Wong, H., & Boushey, H. A. (1993). Cellular and Biochemical Analysis of Induced Sputum from Asthmatic and from Healthy Subjects. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/147.5.1126
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.