Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 468

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

When Tuberculosis Treatment Fails: A Social Behavioral Account of Patient Adherence

Sumartojo, Esther·1993·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

Several conclusions about measuring adherence can be drawn. Probably the best approach is to use multiple measures, including some combination of urine assays, pill counts, and detailed patient interviews. Careful monitoring of patient behavior early in the regimen will help predict whether adherence is likely to be a problem. Microelectronic devices in pill boxes or bottle caps have been used for measuring adherence among patients with tuberculosis, but their effectiveness has not been established. The use of these devices may be particularly troublesome for some groups such as the elderly, or precluded for those whose life styles might interfere with their use such as the homeless or migrant farm workers. Carefully designed patient interviews should be tested to determine whether they can be used to predict adherence. Probably the best predictor of adherence is the patient's previous history of adherence. However, adherence is not a personality trait, but a task-specific behavior. For example, someone who misses many doses of antituberculosis medication may successfully use prescribed eye drops or follow dietary recommendations. Providers need to monitor adherence to antituberculosis medications early in treatment in order to anticipate future problems and to ask patients about specific adherence tasks. Ongoing monitoring is essential for patients taking medicine for active tuberculosis. These patients typically feel well after a few weeks and either may believe that the drugs are no longer necessary or may forget to take medication because there are no longer physical cues of illness. Demographic factors, though easy to measure, do not predict adherence well. Tending to be surrogates for other causal factors, they are not amenable to interventions for behavior change. Placing emphasis on demographic characteristics may lead to discriminatory practices. Patients with social support networks have been more adherent in some studies, and patients who believe in the seriousness of their problems with tuberculosis are more likely to be adherent. Additional research on adherence predictors is needed, but it should reflect the complexity of the problem. This research requires a theory-based approach, which has been essentially missing from studies on adherence and tuberculosis. Research also needs to target predictors for specific groups of patients. There is clear evidence of the effect on adherence of culturally influenced beliefs and attitudes about tuberculosis and its treatment. Cultural factors are associated with misinformation about the medical aspects of the disease and the stigmatization of persons with tuberculosis. Culturally sensitive, targeted information is needed, and some has been developed by local tuberculosis programs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm/147.5.1311

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Update, 1990, MMWR, 39, 153
  2. Tuberculosis, 1990, MMWR, 39, 1
  3. Prevention, 1992, MMWR, 41, 13
  4. Prevention, 1992, MMWR, 41, 1
  5. 10.1164/ajrccm/144.4.745 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Nosocomial, 1991, MMWR, 40, 585
  7. Kirscht JP, 1979, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 189
  8. Addington Ww, 1979, Chest, 76, 741, 10.1378/chest.76.6.741 · DOI
  9. Fox W, 1962, Bull Int Union Tuberc, 32, 307
  10. 10.1378/chest.96.4.815 · doi:10.1378/chest.96.4.815
  11. 10.1001/archinte.1977.03630150030010 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0007-0971(88)90070-8 · doi:10.1016/0007-0971(88)90070-8
  13. 10.1097/00000441-196401000-00002 · doi:10.1097/00000441-196401000-00002
  14. 10.1207/s15324796abm1202_2 · DOI
  15. Stewart M, 1987, Am J Prev Med, 3, 95, 10.1016/S0749-3797(18)31281-9 · DOI
  16. Steele DJ, 1990, J Fam Pract, 30, 294
  17. 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90271-Q · DOI · Paper page
  18. Burkhardt KR, 1980, S Afr Med J, 57, 981
  19. Henderson WT, 1986, J Arkansas Med Soc, 82, 445
  20. 10.1378/chest.98.2.314 · doi:10.1378/chest.98.2.314
  21. Moulding T, 1970, Ann Intern Med, 73, 559, 10.7326/0003-4819-73-4-559 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/BF00561372 · doi:10.1007/bf00561372
  23. Bell J, 1988, S Afr Med J, 73, 31
  24. 10.1164/ajrccm/140.5.1194 · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/140.5.1194
  25. Armstrong RH, 1984, Cent Afr J Med, 30, 144
  26. Henderson MA, 1984, Dharan. J R Army Med Corps, 130, 22, 10.1136/jramc-130-01-06 · doi:10.1136/jramc-130-01-06
  27. Buri PS, 1985, J Med Assoc Thai, 68, 356
  28. Corcoran R, 1986, Ir Med J, 79, 87
  29. Nazar-Stewart V, 1992, Am Rev Respir Dis, 146, 57, 10.1164/ajrccm/146.1.57 · DOI
  30. Dubanoski JP, 1988, Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 10
  31. Rubel AJ, 1992, Public Health Rep, 107, 626
  32. Menegoni L, 1991, Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 03
  33. 10.1093/ije/14.3.457 · doi:10.1093/ije/14.3.457
  34. 10.1016/0041-3879(84)90062-X · doi:10.1016/0041-3879(84)90062-x
  35. 10.1016/0041-3879(84)90026-6 · doi:10.1016/0041-3879(84)90026-6
  36. Metcalf CA, 1990, Cape Town. S Afr Med J, 77, 408
  37. Westaway MS, 1990, Am Rev Respir Dis, 141, A204
  38. Farmer P, 1991, Semin Respir Infect, 6, 254
  39. Cuneo WD, 1989, Clin Chest Med, 10, 375, 10.1016/S0272-5231(21)00640-7 · DOI
  40. American Thoracic Society, 1986, Am Rev Respir Dis, 134, 355
  41. Sbarbaro JA., 1979, Chest, 76, 750, 10.1378/chest.76.6_Supplement.750 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90705-A · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)90705-a
  43. Lange RA, 1986, Journal of Compliance in Health Care, 1, 47
  44. 10.1177/109019819001700303 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1007/BF00845054 · DOI
  46. Edwards BB, 1988, Florida Nurse, 36, 9
  47. Seetha MA, 1981, Indian J Tuberc, 182
  48. Wobeser W, 1989, Clin Invest Med, 12, 149
  49. Becker MH, 1990, New York: Springer, 5
  50. Williamson DE, 1986, Am Rev Respir Dis, 133, A205
  51. Brudney K, 1991, Semin Respir Infect, 6, 261
  52. Manalo F, 1990, Am Rev Respir Dis, 142, 1301, 10.1164/ajrccm/142.6_Pt_1.1301 · DOI
  53. Nuyangulu DS, 1990, Bull Int Union Tuberc, 66, 45
  54. 10.1056/NEJM196812052792305 · DOI
  55. 10.1378/chest.97.4.798 · DOI
  56. McDonald RJ, 1982, Ann Intern Med, 96, 297, 10.7326/0003-4819-96-3-297 · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-96-3-297
  57. Miles SH, 1984, Am Rev Respir Dis, 130, 827
  58. Adler JJ, 1990, Am Rev Respir Dis, 141, A458
  59. Etkind S, 1991, Semin Respir Infect, 6, 273
  60. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1979.tb00788.x · DOI
  61. West C, 1991, Beverly Hills: Sage, 166
  62. Chaulet P, 1990, Bull Int Union Tuberc, 66, 33
  63. 10.1007/BF00844986 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 468

Metadata

Authors
Sumartojo, E.
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1993-05
Volume
147
Issue
5
Pages
1311-1320
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138939303
Cited by
468
References
0
FWCI
24.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When Tuberculosis Treatment Fails: A Social Behavioral Account of Patient Adherence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/147.5.1311
The paper
Sumartojo, E. (1993). When Tuberculosis Treatment Fails: A Social Behavioral Account of Patient Adherence. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/147.5.1311

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.