The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Predictive Value of Appearances on Thin-section Computed Tomography in Fibrosing Alveolitis
Abstract
Fibrosing alveolitis, a condition characterized by a poor prognosis and a limited response to treatment, is readily identified by thin-section computed tomography (CT). Fibrotic and inflammatory histologic results, obtained at open lung biopsy, both have characteristic CT patterns. To evaluate whether CT could predict prognosis and response to therapy, we examined the CT appearances of 76 patients with lone cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis and 66 patients with fibrosing alveolitis associated with systemic sclerosis. CT abnormalities were categorized as predominantly a ground-glass pattern (Grade 1), mixed (Grade 2), or predominantly a reticular pattern (Grade 3). In cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis, 4-yr survival was highest in association with CT Grade 1 and higher with CT Grade 2 than with CT Grade 3, independent of the extent of abnormal lung on CT, duration of dyspnea, or severity of depression of DLCO or FVC, p < 0.001. A response to therapy in previously untreated cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis was seen most frequently with CT Grade 1 and more frequently with CT Grade 2 than with CT Grade 3, p < 0.025. In systemic sclerosis, CT appearances were not predictive of 4-yr survival; a response to therapy was seen more frequently with CT Grade 2 (three of seven patients) than with CT Grade 3 (zero of six patients). These data have shown that CT appearances are of prognostic value in fibrosing alveolitis and that they are likely to play an increasing role in disease-staging in this condition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Diagnosis and Treatment: International Consensus Statement
(2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.2.ats3-00 · Cited by 2,628
Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a Fleischner Society White Paper
Lynch, D. A., Sverzellati, N., Travis, W. D., Brown, K. K., Colby, T. V., Galvin, J. R., Goldin, J. G., Hansell, D. M., Inoue, Y., Johkoh, T., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30433-2 · Cited by 1,030
Self-citationHigh-Dose Acetylcysteine in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Demedts, M., Behr, J., Buhl, R., Costabel, U., Dekhuijzen, R., Jansen, H. M., MacNee, W., Thomeer, M., Wallaert, B., Laurent, F., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa042976 · Cited by 964
Wells, A. U., Desai, S. R., Rubens, M. B., Goh, N. S. L., Cramer, D., Nicholson, A. G., Colby, T. V., du Bois, R. M., & Hansell, D. M. (2003) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.2111053 · Cited by 686
Self-citationKazerooni, E. A., Martinez, F. J., Flint, A., Jamadar, D. A., Gross, B. H., Spizarny, D. L., Cascade, P. N., Whyte, R. I., Lynch, J. P., & Toews, G. (1997) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.169.4.9308447 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Wells, A. U., Hansell, D. M., Rubens, M. B., Cullinan, P., Black, C. M., & Du Bois, R. M.
- Venue
- American Review of Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-10
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 4_pt_1
- Pages
- 1076-1082
- ISSN
- 0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066182033
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Predictive Value of Appearances on Thin-section Computed Tomography in Fibrosing Alveolitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/148.4_pt_1.1076
- The paper
- Wells, A. U., Hansell, D. M., Rubens, M. B., Cullinan, P., Black, C. M., & Du Bois, R. M. (1993). The Predictive Value of Appearances on Thin-section Computed Tomography in Fibrosing Alveolitis. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/148.4_pt_1.1076
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.