Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thin-section CT obtained at 10-mm increments versus limited three-level thin-section CT for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: correlation with pathologic scoring.

Kazerooni, E A, Martinez, F J, Flint, A, Jamadar, D A, Gross, B H, Spizarny, D L, Cascade, P N, Whyte, R I, Lynch, J P, Toews, G·1997·American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine if three-level thin-section CT depicts idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) pathology as accurately as CT obtained at 10-mm increments throughout the entire lungs. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thin-section (1.0- to 1.5-mm) images at 10-mm increments were obtained and scored prospectively in 25 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed IPF who were participating in a Special Center of Research grant for interstitial lung disease. Each patient's lobe was scored by four thoracic radiologists on a scale of 0-5 for both ground-glass attenuation and fibrosis. The radiologists used three images (limited CT) and also used the entire data set (complete CT). CT scores were compared with pathology scores from 67 open and thoracoscopic biopsies. Limited and complete scores were compared with each other (Pearson correlation coefficient). Interobserver variation in the CT scoring system was assessed using kappa values. RESULTS: CT fibrosis scores strongly correlated with pathology fibrosis scores for complete (r = .53, p = .0001) and limited (r = .50, p = .0001) CT. CT ground-glass scores correlated with the histologic inflammatory scores for each lobe on complete (r = .27, p = .03) and limited (r = .26, p = .03) CT. The desquamative subcomponent of the pathology inflammatory score had the highest correlation with the CT ground-glass scores (complete: r = .29, p = .01; limited: r = .33, p = .007). Good interobserver agreement existed for both the alveolar and fibrosis components of the CT scoring system (kappa values ranging from .51 to .83) for each lobe of the lung on limited and complete CT. CONCLUSION: Limited thin-section CT reveals the pathologic changes associated with IPF as well as CT obtained at 10-mm increments. An added advantage of limited thin-section CT is that it exposes patients to less radiation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2214/ajr.169.4.9308447

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 469

Metadata

Authors
Kazerooni, E. A., Martinez, F. J., Flint, A., Jamadar, D. A., Gross, B. H., Spizarny, D. L., Cascade, P. N., Whyte, R. I., Lynch, J. P., & Toews, G.
Venue
American Journal of Roentgenology
Published
1997-10
Volume
169
Issue
4
Pages
977-983
ISSN
  • 0002-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 0361-803X
  • 1546-3141
OpenAlex
W2005041300
Cited by
469
References
14
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thin-section CT obtained at 10-mm increments versus limited three-level thin-section CT for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: correlation with pathologic scoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2214/ajr.169.4.9308447
The paper
Kazerooni, E. A., Martinez, F. J., Flint, A., Jamadar, D. A., Gross, B. H., Spizarny, D. L., Cascade, P. N., Whyte, R. I., Lynch, J. P., & Toews, G. (1997). Thin-section CT obtained at 10-mm increments versus limited three-level thin-section CT for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: correlation with pathologic scoring. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.169.4.9308447

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.