Cited by 126Occupational and environmental lung diseasesInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis and Aluminum Dust Exposure

Miller, Roberta R., Churg, Andrew M., Hutcheon, Marion, Lam, Stephen·1984·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

A 44-yr-old male presented with shortness of breath, diffuse X-ray infiltrates, and physiologic evidence of a restrictive lung disease. Biopsy revealed pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. The patient had worked for the previous 6 yr as an aluminum rail grinder in a very dusty environment. Analysis of his lung tissue revealed greater than 300 x 106 particles of aluminum/g dry lung; all of the particles appeared as spheres of less than 1 μ diameter. We believe that this case represents an example of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis induced by inhalation of aluminum particles; this finding confirms animal studies which suggest that proteinosis can be produced by very large doses of many types of finely divided mineral dust.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/arrd.1984.130.2.312

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pulmonary lesions in humans linked to Al exposure during production of Al products include granulomatous pneumonia, pulmonary granulomatosis, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and desquamative interstitial pneumonia.

    “Pulmonary lesions in humans linked to Al exposure during production of Al products include granulomatous pneumonia, pulmonary granulomatosis, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and desquamative interstitial pneumonia (Chen et al., 1978; Herbert et al., 1982; Miller et al., 1984; De Vuyst et al., 1987; Jederlinic et al., 1990; Taiwo, 2014; Iijima et al., 2017).”

    From Aluminium toxicosis: a review of toxic actions and effects (2019) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 1984

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Miller, R. R., Churg, A. M., Hutcheon, M., & Lam, S.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Miller, Roberta R.
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1984-08-01
Volume
130
Issue
2
Pages
312-315
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1824141053
Cited by
126
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Review of Respiratory Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Occupational and environmental lung diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Keywords
pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, aluminum particles, occupational dust inhalation, restrictive lung disease, lung biopsy, rail grinding
MeSH terms
Adult, Aluminum, Biopsy, Dust, Environmental Exposure, Humans, Lung, Male, Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review