The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aldehydes in Exhaled Breath Condensate of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Abstract
The aims of the present study were (1) to evaluate whether individual aldehydes resulting from lipid peroxidation can be measured in exhaled breath condensate, (2) to assess the influence of sampling procedures on aldehyde concentrations, and (3) to compare aldehyde levels of patients with stable, moderate to severe, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with those of smoking and nonsmoking control subjects. Aldehydes (malondialdehyde, hexanal, heptanal, and nonanal) were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in all samples and overlapping results were obtained by different sampling procedures. Malondialdehyde (57.2 +/- 2.4 nmol/L), hexanal (63.5 +/- 4.4 nmol/L), and heptanal (26.6 +/- 3.9 nmol/L) were increased in patients as compared with nonsmoking control subjects (17.7 +/- 5.5 nmol/L, p < 0.0001; 14.2 +/- 3.5 nmol/L, p = 0.004; and 18.7 +/- 0.9 nmol/L, p = 0.002, respectively). Only malondialdehyde was increased in patients compared with smoking control subjects (35.6 +/- 4.0 nmol/L, p = 0.0007). In conclusion, different classes of aldehydes were identified in exhaled breath condensate of humans. Whereas all aldehydes but nonanal were lower in control subjects as compared with other groups, only malondialdehyde distinguished smoking control subjects from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and could be envisaged as a biomarker potentially useful to monitor the disease and its response to therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Systemic oxidative stress in asthma, COPD, and smokers
Rahman, I., Morrison, D., Donaldson, K., & MacNee, W. (1996) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.154.4.8887607 · Cited by 774
Cited by
Exhaled breath condensate: methodological recommendations and unresolved questions
Horváth, I., Hunt, J., & Barnes, P. J. (2005) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00029705 · Cited by 1,284
Mediators of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Barnes, P. J. (2004) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.56.4.2 · Cited by 710
Pharmacological antioxidant strategies as therapeutic interventions for COPD
Rahman, I. (2012) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.11.004 · Cited by 117
Ngoepe, M., Choonara, Y., Tyagi, C., Tomar, L., Du Toit, L., Kumar, P., Ndesendo, V., & Pillay, V. (2013) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s130607680 · Cited by 92
Alcohol, Aldehydes, Adducts and Airways
Sapkota, M., & Wyatt, T. (2015) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom5042987 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Corradi, M., Rubinstein, I., Andreoli, R., Manini, P., Caglieri, A., Poli, D., Alinovi, R., & Mutti, A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-05-15
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1380-1386
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2041208066
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aldehydes in Exhaled Breath Condensate of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200210-1253oc
- The paper
- Corradi, M., Rubinstein, I., Andreoli, R., Manini, P., Caglieri, A., Poli, D., Alinovi, R., & Mutti, A. (2003). Aldehydes in Exhaled Breath Condensate of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200210-1253oc
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.