Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 316

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnosing Pneumonia during Mechanical Ventilation: The Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score Revisited

Fartoukh, Muriel, Maître, Bernard, Honoré, Stéphanie, Cerf, Charles, Zahar, Jean-Ralph, Brun-Buisson, Christian·2003·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

The clinical pulmonary infection score-original or modified-has been proposed for the diagnosis and management of ventilator-associated pneumonia. In 79 episodes of suspected pneumonia, we prospectively assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the physicians' clinical assessment of probability and of the modified clinical pulmonary infection score, both measured before (pretest) and after (post-test) incorporating gram stains results, using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid culture as the reference test. The pretest clinical estimate was inaccurate (sensitivity 50%, specificity 58%); the mean clinical pulmonary infection score at baseline was 6.5 +/- 1.3 (range, 3-9) and 5.9 +/- 1.7 (range, 3-9), respectively, for the 40 confirmed and the 39 nonconfirmed episodes (p = 0.07), and only slightly more accurate (sensitivity 60%, specificity 59%) than the clinical prediction. Incorporating the gram stain results of either directed or blind protected sampling increased the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 49% and 78% and 56%, respectively) of the clinical score and increased the likelihood ratio for pneumonia of a score of more than six from 1.46 to 1.67 and 1.77. The clinical pulmonary infection score has low diagnostic accuracy; however, incorporating gram stains results into the score may help clinical decision making in patients with clinically suspected pneumonia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200212-1449oc

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 316

Metadata

Authors
Fartoukh, M., Maître, B., Honoré, S., Cerf, C., Zahar, J.-R., & Brun-Buisson, C.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2003-07-15
Volume
168
Issue
2
Pages
173-179
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2104255090
Cited by
316
References
1
FWCI
13.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosing Pneumonia during Mechanical Ventilation: The Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200212-1449oc
The paper
Fartoukh, M., Maître, B., Honoré, S., Cerf, C., Zahar, J.-R., & Brun-Buisson, C. (2003). Diagnosing Pneumonia during Mechanical Ventilation: The Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score Revisited. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200212-1449oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.