The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Specific Detection of Tuberculosis Infection: An Interferon-γ–based Assay Using New Antigens
Abstract
The tuberculin skin test for immunologic diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection has many limitations, including being confounded by bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination or exposure to nontuberculous mycobacteria. M. tuberculosis-specific antigens that are absent from BCG and most nontuberculous mycobacteria have been identified. We examined the use of two of these antigens, CFP-10 and ESAT-6, in a whole blood IFN-gamma assay as a diagnostic test for tuberculosis in BCG-vaccinated individuals. Because of the lack of an accurate standard with which to compare new tests for M. tuberculosis infection, specificity of the whole blood IFN-gamma assay was estimated on the basis of data from people with no identified risk for M. tuberculosis exposure (216 BCG-vaccinated Japanese adults) and sensitivity was estimated on the basis of data from 118 patients with culture-confirmed M. tuberculosis infection who had received less than 1 week of treatment. Using a combination of CFP-10 and ESAT-6 responses, the specificity of the test for the low-risk group was 98.1% and the sensitivity for patients with M. tuberculosis infection was 89.0%. The results demonstrate that the whole blood IFN-gamma assay using CFP-10 and ESAT-6 was highly specific and sensitive for M. tuberculosis infection and was unaffected by BCG vaccination status.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interferon-γ assays in the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: a systematic review
Pai, M., Riley, L. W., & Colford, J. M. (2004) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(04)01206-x · Cited by 913
A systematic review of rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of tuberculosis infection
Dinnes, J., Deeks, J., Kunst, H., Gibson, A., Cummins, E., Waugh, N., Drobniewski, F., & Lalvani, A. (2007) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta11030 · Cited by 666
ESAT-6 proteins: protective antigens and virulence factors?
Brodin, P., Rosenkrands, I., Andersen, P., Cole, S. T., & Brosch, R. (2004) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2004.09.007 · Cited by 312
Comparison of two commercial interferon-γ assays for diagnosing Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection
Lee, J. Y., Choi, H. J., Park, I.-N., Hong, S.-B., Oh, Y.-M., Lim, C.-M., Lee, S. D., Koh, Y., Kim, W. S., Kim, D. S., et al. (2006) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.06.00016906 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Mori, T., Sakatani, M., Yamagishi, F., Takashima, T., Kawabe, Y., Nagao, K., Shigeto, E., Harada, N., Mitarai, S., Okada, M., Suzuki, K., Inoue, Y., Tsuyuguchi, K., Sasaki, Y., Mazurek, G. H., & Tsuyuguchi, I.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-07-01
- Volume
- 170
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-64
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2102777134
- Cited by
- 657
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specific Detection of Tuberculosis Infection: An Interferon-γ–based Assay Using New Antigens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200402-179oc
- The paper
- Mori, T., Sakatani, M., Yamagishi, F., Takashima, T., Kawabe, Y., Nagao, K., Shigeto, E., Harada, N., Mitarai, S., Okada, M., Suzuki, K., Inoue, Y., Tsuyuguchi, K., Sasaki, Y., Mazurek, G. H., & Tsuyuguchi, I. (2004). Specific Detection of Tuberculosis Infection: An Interferon-γ–based Assay Using New Antigens. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200402-179oc
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.