Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Moxifloxacin versus Ethambutol in the First 2 Months of Treatment for Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Burman, William J., Goldberg, Stefan, Johnson, John L., Muzanye, Grace, Engle, Melissa, Mosher, Ann W., Choudhri, Shurjeel, Daley, Charles L., Munsiff, Sonal S., Zhao, Zhen, Vernon, Andrew, Chaisson, Richard E.·2006·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Moxifloxacin has promising preclinical activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, but has not been evaluated in multidrug treatment of tuberculosis in humans. OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of moxifloxacin versus ethambutol, both in combination with isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide, on sputum culture conversion at 2 mo as a measure of the potential sterilizing activity of alternate induction regimens. METHODS: Adults with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis were randomized in a factorial design to receive moxifloxacin (400 mg) versus ethambutol given 5 d/wk versus 3 d/wk (after 2 wk of daily therapy). All doses were directly observed. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was sputum culture status at 2 mo of treatment. RESULTS: Of 336 patients enrolled, 277 (82%) were eligible for the efficacy analysis, 186 (67%) were male, 175 (63%) were enrolled at African sites, 206 (74%) had cavitation on chest radiograph, and 60 (22%) had HIV infection. Two-month cultures were negative in 71% of patients (99 of 139) treated with moxifloxacin versus 71% (98 of 138) treated with ethambutol (p = 0.97). Patients receiving moxifloxacin, however, more often had negative cultures after 4 wk of treatment. Patients treated with moxifloxacin more often reported nausea (22 vs. 9%, p = 0.002), but similar proportions completed study treatment (88 vs. 89%). Dosing frequency had little effect on 2-mo culture status or tolerability of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of moxifloxacin to isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide did not affect 2-mo sputum culture status but did show increased activity at earlier time points.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200603-360oc

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Burman, W. J., Goldberg, S., Johnson, J. L., Muzanye, G., Engle, M., Mosher, A. W., Choudhri, S., Daley, C. L., Munsiff, S. S., Zhao, Z., Vernon, A., & Chaisson, R. E.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2006-08-01
Volume
174
Issue
3
Pages
331-338
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2135989318
Cited by
286
References
1
FWCI
15.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moxifloxacin versus Ethambutol in the First 2 Months of Treatment for Pulmonary Tuberculosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200603-360oc
The paper
Burman, W. J., Goldberg, S., Johnson, J. L., Muzanye, G., Engle, M., Mosher, A. W., Choudhri, S., Daley, C. L., Munsiff, S. S., Zhao, Z., Vernon, A., & Chaisson, R. E. (2006). Moxifloxacin versus Ethambutol in the First 2 Months of Treatment for Pulmonary Tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200603-360oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.