Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Substitution of Moxifloxacin for Isoniazid during Intensive Phase Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Dorman, Susan E., Johnson, John L., Goldberg, Stefan, Muzanye, Grace, Padayatchi, Nesri, Bozeman, Lorna, Heilig, Charles M., Bernardo, John, Choudhri, Shurjeel, Grosset, Jacques H., Guy, Elizabeth, Guyadeen, Priya, Leus, Maria Corazon, Maltas, Gina, Menzies, Dick, Nuermberger, Eric L., Villarino, Margarita, Vernon, Andrew, Chaisson, Richard E., the Tuberculosis Trials Consortium·2009·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Moxifloxacin has potent activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vitro and in a mouse model of antituberculosis (TB) chemotherapy, but data regarding its activity in humans are limited. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to compare the antimicrobial activity and safety of moxifloxacin versus isoniazid during the first 8 weeks of combination therapy for pulmonary TB. METHODS: Adults with sputum smear-positive pulmonary TB were randomly assigned to receive either moxifloxacin 400 mg plus isoniazid placebo, or isoniazid 300 mg plus moxifloxacin placebo, administered 5 days/week for 8 weeks, in addition to rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. All doses were directly observed. Sputum was collected for culture every 2 weeks. The primary outcome was negative sputum culture at completion of 8 weeks of treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 433 participants enrolled, 328 were eligible for the primary efficacy analysis. Of these, 35 (11%) were HIV positive, 248 (76%) had cavitation on baseline chest radiograph, and 213 (65%) were enrolled at African sites. Negative cultures at Week 8 were observed in 90/164 (54.9%) participants in the isoniazid arm, and 99/164 (60.4%) in the moxifloxacin arm (P = 0.37). In multivariate analysis, cavitation and enrollment at an African site were associated with lower likelihood of Week-8 culture negativity. The proportion of participants who discontinued assigned treatment was 31/214 (14.5%) for the moxifloxacin group versus 22/205 (10.7%) for the isoniazid group (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.81, 2.25). CONCLUSIONS: Substitution of moxifloxacin for isoniazid resulted in a small but statistically nonsignificant increase in Week-8 culture negativity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200901-0078oc

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Dorman, S. E., Johnson, J. L., Goldberg, S., Muzanye, G., Padayatchi, N., Bozeman, L., Heilig, C. M., Bernardo, J., Choudhri, S., Grosset, J. H., Guy, E., Guyadeen, P., Leus, M. C., Maltas, G., Menzies, D., Nuermberger, E. L., Villarino, M., Vernon, A., Chaisson, R. E., & the Tuberculosis Trials Consortium
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2009-08-01
Volume
180
Issue
3
Pages
273-280
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2134527984
Cited by
264
References
21
FWCI
22.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Substitution of Moxifloxacin for Isoniazid during Intensive Phase Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200901-0078oc
The paper
Dorman, S. E., Johnson, J. L., Goldberg, S., Muzanye, G., Padayatchi, N., Bozeman, L., Heilig, C. M., Bernardo, J., Choudhri, S., Grosset, J. H., Guy, E., Guyadeen, P., Leus, M. C., Maltas, G., Menzies, D., Nuermberger, E. L., Villarino, M., Vernon, A., Chaisson, R. E., & the Tuberculosis Trials Consortium. (2009). Substitution of Moxifloxacin for Isoniazid during Intensive Phase Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200901-0078oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.