Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 597

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prognosis of Fibrotic Interstitial Pneumonia: Idiopathic versus Collagen Vascular Disease–related Subtypes

Park, Joo Hun, Kim, Dong Soon, Park, I-Nae, Jang, Se Jin, Kitaichi, Masanori, Nicholson, Andrew G., Colby, Thomas V.·2007·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether the better prognosis of interstitial pneumonias associated with collagen vascular disease (CVD) compared with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) is due to higher frequency of the nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern in CVD, we compared the outcomes of patients from these two groups with the same histopathologic pattern. SUBJECTS: The clinical features and survival of 362 patients (269 with IIP and 93 with CVD) diagnosed using surgical lung biopsy were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean survival of the CVD group (131.0 mo) was longer than that of the IIP group (80.5 mo) (p<0.0001). The patients with usual interstitial pneumonia pattern among the CVD group (n=36) was younger, female, and predominantly nonsmoking compared with the IIP group (n=203). Although baseline lung functions were not significantly different, the CVD group survived longer (mean, 177.0 mo) than the IIP group (mean, 66.9 +/- 6.5 mo; p=0.001). By multivariate analysis, younger age, better pulmonary function, and the presence of a CVD were independent prognostic factors. In NSIP pattern, no significant differences in survival, clinical features, or lung function were found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the better prognosis of patients in the CVD group is not solely due to the predominance of the NSIP pattern. The prognosis of patients with the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern in CVD is better than in those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, despite the same pathologic pattern. In contrast, in those with an NSIP pattern, the prognosis is similar in both groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200607-912oc

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 597

Metadata

Authors
Park, J. H., Kim, D. S., Park, I.-N., Jang, S. J., Kitaichi, M., Nicholson, A. G., & Colby, T. V.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2007-04-01
Volume
175
Issue
7
Pages
705-711
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1910502462
Cited by
597
References
0
FWCI
26.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognosis of Fibrotic Interstitial Pneumonia: Idiopathic versus Collagen Vascular Disease–related Subtypes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200607-912oc
The paper
Park, J. H., Kim, D. S., Park, I.-N., Jang, S. J., Kitaichi, M., Nicholson, A. G., & Colby, T. V. (2007). Prognosis of Fibrotic Interstitial Pneumonia: Idiopathic versus Collagen Vascular Disease–related Subtypes. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200607-912oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.