Cited by 65Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisOccupational and environmental lung diseasesSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The performance of the GAP model in patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease

Open access

Abstract

Background Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Similarities have been observed between patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and the UIP (usual interstitial pneumonia) form of RA-ILD. The GAP (gender, age, physiology) model has been shown to predict mortality in patients with IPF, but its ability to predict mortality in RA-ILD is not known.Methods We identified 309 patients with RA-ILD at 4 academic centers with ongoing longitudinal cohorts of patients with ILD. The primary endpoint was mortality. To handle missing data (n = 219 subjects with complete dataset), multiple imputation by iterative chained equations was used. Using the GAP model as a baseline, we assessed improvements in mortality risk prediction achieved by incorporating additional variables. Model discrimination was assessed using the c-index, and calibration was checked by comparing observed and expected incidence of death.Results Patients had a mean age of 65 years and were predominantly female (54%). The mean forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted was 73 and the mean diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DL CO) % predicted was 55. Twenty-four percent of the 236 patients with a high-resolution computed tomography scan available for review had a definite UIP pattern. The original GAP model, including gender, age, FVC%, and DL CO%, had a c-index of 0.746 in our cohort. Calibration of this model was satisfactory at 1, 2 and 3 years. Model discrimination was not meaningfully improved by adding other clinical variables.Conclusion The GAP model that was derived for IPF performs similarly as a mortality risk prediction tool in RA-ILD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.04.012

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Composite outcome predictors in interstitial lung disease have limited clinical uptake and external validation.

    “Different composite predictors of outcome have been developed in the past years; however, clinical uptake and external validation is limited.(226–232)”

    From Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. (2021) · cites this paper as [230]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies GAP as a validated mortality predictor in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis but says its performance in rheumatoid arthritis–associated ILD was not known. That supports a validation gap for this specific population, not the broader claim that composite predictors across ILD have limited external validation. The paper does not address clinical uptake. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Morisset, J., Vittinghoff, E., Lee, B. Y., Tonelli, R., Hu, X., Elicker, B. M., Ryu, J. H., Jones, K. D., Cerri, S., Manfredi, A., Sebastiani, M., Gross, A. J., Ley, B., Wolters, P. J., King, T. E., Kim, D. S., Collard, H. R., & Lee, J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Morisset, Julie
Venue
Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
127
Pages
51-56
ISSN
0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2605649105
Cited by
65
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UCSF-CTI KL2TR000143)
  • Nina Ireland Program for Lung Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Occupational and environmental lung diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease, gap model, mortality prediction, usual interstitial pneumonia, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, model discrimination, model calibration, forced vital capacity, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, high-resolution computed tomography
MeSH terms
Aged, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Carbon Monoxide, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Vital Capacity, Incidence, Lung Diseases, Interstitial, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review