Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 460

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Blockade in Severe Persistent Asthma

Wenzel, Sally E., Barnes, Peter J., Bleecker, Eugene R., Bousquet, Jean, Busse, William, Dahlén, Sven-Erik, Holgate, Stephen T., Meyers, Deborah A., Rabe, Klaus F., Antczak, Adam, Baker, James, Horvath, Ildiko, Mark, Zsuzsanna, Bernstein, David, Kerwin, Edward, Schlenker-Herceg, Rozsa, Lo, Kim Hung, Watt, Rosemary, Barnathan, Elliot S., Chanez, Pascal·2009·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: The treatment effect of golimumab, a human monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, in severe persistent asthma is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of golimumab in a large population of patients with uncontrolled, severe persistent asthma. METHODS: From 2004 to 2006, 309 patients with severe and uncontrolled asthma, despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta(2) agonists, were randomized 1:1:1:1 to monthly subcutaneous injections of placebo or golimumab (50, 100, or 200 mg) through Week 52. Coprimary endpoints were the change from baseline through Week 24 in prebronchodilator percent-predicted FEV(1) and the number of severe asthma exacerbations through Week 24. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: No significant differences were observed for the change in percent-predicted FEV1 (least squares mean: placebo, 2.44 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.574 to 5.461]; combined 100-mg and 200-mg, 2.91 [0.696-5.116]) or severe exacerbations (mean +/- SD: placebo, 0.5 +/- 1.07 vs. combined 100-mg and 200-mg 0.5 +/- 0.97) through week 24. Through Week 24, 2.6% of patients treated with placebo vs. 19.5% of those treated with golimumab discontinued the study agent, and 1.3% and 7.8% discontinued study participation, respectively. An unfavorable risk-benefit profile led to early discontinuation of study-agent administration after the Week-24 database lock. Through Week 76, 20.5% of patients treated with placebo and 30.3% of patients treated with golimumab experienced serious adverse events, with serious infections occurring more frequently in golimumab-treated patients. One death and all eight malignancies occurred in the active groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, treatment with golimumab did not demonstrate a favorable risk-benefit profile in this study population of patients with severe persistent asthma. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00207740).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200809-1512oc

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 460

Metadata

Authors
Wenzel, S. E., Barnes, P. J., Bleecker, E. R., Bousquet, J., Busse, W., Dahlén, S.-E., Holgate, S. T., Meyers, D. A., Rabe, K. F., Antczak, A., Baker, J., Horvath, I., Mark, Z., Bernstein, D., Kerwin, E., Schlenker-Herceg, R., Lo, K. H., Watt, R., Barnathan, E. S., & Chanez, P.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2009-04-01
Volume
179
Issue
7
Pages
549-558
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2025111901
Cited by
460
References
0
FWCI
29.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Blockade in Severe Persistent Asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200809-1512oc
The paper
Wenzel, S. E., Barnes, P. J., Bleecker, E. R., Bousquet, J., Busse, W., Dahlén, S.-E., Holgate, S. T., Meyers, D. A., Rabe, K. F., Antczak, A., Baker, J., Horvath, I., Mark, Z., Bernstein, D., Kerwin, E., Schlenker-Herceg, R., Lo, K. H., Watt, R., Barnathan, E. S., & Chanez, P. (2009). A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Blockade in Severe Persistent Asthma. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200809-1512oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.