Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,075

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accuracy of Doppler Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension

Open access
Fisher, Micah R., Forfia, Paul R., Chamera, Elzbieta, Housten-Harris, Traci, Champion, Hunter C., Girgis, Reda E., Corretti, Mary C., Hassoun, Paul M.·2009·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is recommended for screening for the presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, some recent studies have suggested that Doppler echocardiographic pulmonary artery pressure estimates may frequently be inaccurate. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the accuracy of Doppler echocardiography for estimating pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study on patients with various forms of PH who underwent comprehensive Doppler echocardiography within 1 hour of a clinically indicated right-heart catheterization to compare noninvasive hemodynamic estimates with invasively measured values. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 65 patients completed the study protocol. Using Bland-Altman analytic methods, the bias for the echocardiographic estimates of the pulmonary artery systolic pressure was -0.6 mm Hg with 95% limits of agreement ranging from +38.8 to -40.0 mm Hg. Doppler echocardiography was inaccurate (defined as being greater than +/-10 mm Hg of the invasive measurement) in 48% of cases. Overestimation and underestimation of pulmonary artery systolic pressure by Doppler echocardiography occurred with a similar frequency (16 vs. 15 instances, respectively). The magnitude of pressure underestimation was greater than overestimation (-30 +/- 16 vs. +19 +/- 11 mm Hg; P = 0.03); underestimates by Doppler also led more often to misclassification of the severity of the PH. For cardiac output measurement, the bias was -0.1 L/min with 95% limits of agreement ranging from +2.2 to -2.4 L/min. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler echocardiography may frequently be inaccurate in estimating pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output in patients being evaluated for PH.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200811-1691oc

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,075

Metadata

Authors
Fisher, M. R., Forfia, P. R., Chamera, E., Housten-Harris, T., Champion, H. C., Girgis, R. E., Corretti, M. C., & Hassoun, P. M.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2009-04-01
Volume
179
Issue
7
Pages
615-621
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2098196669
Cited by
1,075
References
1
FWCI
49.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of Doppler Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200811-1691oc
The paper
Fisher, M. R., Forfia, P. R., Chamera, E., Housten-Harris, T., Champion, H. C., Girgis, R. E., Corretti, M. C., & Hassoun, P. M. (2009). Accuracy of Doppler Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200811-1691oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.