Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 654

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Natural History of Chronic Airflow Obstruction Revisited: An Analysis of the Framingham Offspring Cohort

Kohansal, Robab, Martinez-Camblor, Pablo, Agustí, Alvar, Buist, A. Sonia, Mannino, David M., Soriano, Joan B.·2009·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Understanding normal lung development and aging in health and disease, both in men and in women, is essential to interpreting any therapeutic intervention. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to describe lung function changes in healthy never-smoking males and females, from adolescence to old age, and to determine the effects of smoking and those derived from quitting. METHODS: Prospective cohort study within all participants of the Framingham Offspring cohort who had two or more valid spirometry measurements during follow-up (n = 4,391; age range at baseline 13 to 71 yr), with a median follow-up time of 23 years. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: To best fit the curves describing FEV(1) changes with age to raw data, we used a generalized additive model with smooth terms and incorporating the subject-specific (longitudinal) random effects. We found that: (1) healthy never-smoker females achieve full lung growth earlier than males, and their rate of decline with age was slightly, but not significantly, lower; (2) smoking increases the rate of lung function decline, both in males and in females; (3) there is a range of susceptibility to the effects of smoking. The presence of respiratory symptoms at baseline and/or a respiratory diagnosis during follow-up appears to identify a group of susceptible smokers; and (4) quitting smoking has a beneficial effect at any age, but it is more pronounced in earlier quitters. CONCLUSIONS: Lung function changes from adolescence to old age differ in males and females, smoking has similar deleterious effects in both sexes, and quitting earlier is better.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200901-0047oc

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 654

Metadata

Authors
Kohansal, R., Martinez-Camblor, P., Agustí, A., Buist, A. S., Mannino, D. M., & Soriano, J. B.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2009-07-01
Volume
180
Issue
1
Pages
3-10
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2103809903
Cited by
654
References
1
FWCI
32.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Natural History of Chronic Airflow Obstruction Revisited: An Analysis of the Framingham Offspring Cohort. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200901-0047oc
The paper
Kohansal, R., Martinez-Camblor, P., Agustí, A., Buist, A. S., Mannino, D. M., & Soriano, J. B. (2009). The Natural History of Chronic Airflow Obstruction Revisited: An Analysis of the Framingham Offspring Cohort. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200901-0047oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.